Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences.
about
Older Adults' Outdoor Walking: Inequalities in Neighbourhood Safety, Pedestrian Infrastructure and AestheticsConceptualizing Concurrent Enrollment: Why High-Achieving Students Go For ItAdvancing safe drug use through interprofessional learning (IPL): a pilot study.A UK validation of a general measure of subjective well-being: the modified BBC subjective well-being scale (BBC-SWB).Perceptual and motor attribute ratings for 559 object conceptsPrimary outcome measure use in back pain trials may need radical reassessmentThe improved Clinical Global Impression Scale (iCGI): development and validation in depressionAre patients satisfied with a web-based followup after total joint arthroplasty?The Effect of Extreme Response and Non-extreme Response Styles on Testing Measurement Invariance.The impact of the design of payment scales on the willingness to pay for health gains.Designing questionnaires: healthcare survey to compare two different response scales.Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L).OB3D, a new set of 3D objects available for research: a web-based study.Career unreadiness in relation to anxiety and authoritarian parenting among undergraduates.The effect of furnishing on perceived spatial dimensions and spaciousness of interior spaceIs less more? A preliminary investigation of the number of response categories in self-reported painExploring the perspectives and preferences for HTA across German healthcare stakeholders using a multi-criteria assessment of a pulmonary heart sensor as a case study.Balancing costs and benefits at different stages of medical innovation: a systematic review of Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA).Enhancing students' learning in problem based learning: validation of a self-assessment scale for active learning and critical thinking.Rasch analysis of the Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation questionnaire.The interpersonal needs questionnaire with a shortened response scale for oral administration with older adults.Pragmatic characteristics of patient-reported outcome measures are important for use in clinical practice.Consensus building for development of outpatient adverse drug event triggersAssessing health literacy in the eastern and middle-eastern culturesEvaluating psychosocial support needs of female cancer patients in the State of Qatar.Real-life assessment of the validity of patient global impression of change in fibromyalgia.Can cognitive insight predict symptom remission in a first episode psychosis cohort?The importance of rating scales in measuring patient-reported outcomes.Quantification of the level descriptors for the standard EQ-5D three-level system and a five-level version according to two methodsA randomised comparison of a four- and a five-point scale version of the Norwegian Function Assessment Scale.Measuring therapeutic response in chronic graft-versus-host disease. National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: IV. The 2014 Response Criteria Working Group reporGenome-wide association analysis on five isolated populations identifies variants of the HLA-DOA gene associated with white wine liking.Validation of a new questionnaire with generic and disease-specific qualities: the McGill COPD Quality of Life Questionnaire.Comparison of antiretroviral adherence questions.The association between seeking financial compensation and injury recovery following motor vehicle related orthopaedic trauma.Instrumentation and Motivations for Organised Cycling: The Development of the Cyclist Motivation Instrument (CMI)The Seniors' Outdoor Survey: An Observational Tool for Assessing Outdoor Environments at Long-Term Care Settings.Pain assessment tools in palliative care: an urgent need for consensus.Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design.Using a Mixed IRT Model to Assess the Scale Usage in the Measurement of Job Satisfaction.
P2860
Q28584529-E69897AE-BCDA-4166-8CEE-B55D01E3E598Q29031865-0FF43016-B448-4FA5-A8FD-8D0FE55CB3A3Q30210682-E8D1A08B-3C0B-4CE7-9C94-90588AA55F04Q30486356-2B04917E-8090-40B7-9739-DDD08575F324Q30526487-F2BAE6DC-A212-4D1B-9EDE-FD385E5D50EDQ30647620-A285330C-6BCC-49BF-A1F9-4983E91741FBQ33272500-EE60676D-B145-4260-A101-80C5EA8E8216Q33592239-03F9476E-963F-41EB-845E-804F245BCC1BQ33716165-B41B5414-AB79-41E6-A74F-EBCAFF1F6B36Q33840364-8E34494C-02DC-44F5-8EC6-CB5C38D04543Q34021195-F5A86C94-AEC3-413B-BB05-BCCD2CE4C916Q34177200-0D356D89-1000-4009-B2C3-6BE3213A95E3Q34292198-83F67F88-A8F2-4301-ABB3-581825F7CCA3Q34532069-95A1BA88-83F3-46C9-8DA9-FF500F3334E1Q34542352-7FFC8FC5-2BA1-4615-B67F-661371758402Q35062396-28A46AD2-6EEC-4D33-A95D-7D5DA2DF7855Q35583822-F58EDD2A-850A-4E4E-857C-744B5784DF14Q35685387-27BBCE47-5C5C-41D4-B009-34FBDF9399A9Q35755212-D4A8A9A1-0520-4BFA-A7B6-01AE1D41099EQ35786053-029668CA-0F3E-4867-BC9C-0043C198031CQ35904660-7579CFEF-F2E8-47E6-9E4E-42051121DEB0Q35967725-69BCA39A-BC1A-4D38-B292-40B3A83FCC33Q36023365-1AED1558-5772-4500-AFCE-AC3AD53B0957Q36107370-BD55B482-6F5E-4264-AD7C-D9A4F036E451Q36187480-D71CC74C-68E2-4182-A756-C3F40B1A7EACQ36215846-C8349C51-20D7-4A2E-9380-311C191D1D6BQ36272089-E26DCA96-CB32-4D88-93E2-2A2EE34C14A6Q36415985-B225F340-312F-42AE-BA92-700BDD1C1A5EQ36509636-2ED747C3-CFF2-46A1-92B9-34BC9215D6BBQ36511754-B68DF727-CAC4-4FED-91B9-9C4C6ED2FAE3Q36554724-3760F127-59AA-4DC6-882F-3B1E434FD8F0Q36695794-532D355B-55F0-4267-8342-E0BA21FC167DQ36703192-4ED98C8A-CC65-4B1E-8F43-3D6D440B11BCQ36950629-8FCFFC1E-EEBE-466A-B415-4A20CC5C6069Q37093913-5D5B1AA6-9280-46A3-A4D2-678EBC41EA10Q37143208-C63F2D1D-EF30-4A36-85C8-EBFDC560EEA0Q37238033-B6617DF8-47B4-4010-B9B8-CF39AADB1FD6Q37272337-6825BC9E-A493-42D0-A837-6799B52A2865Q37389312-AFA9559C-85B1-4B2D-A315-9017ED138B96Q37553263-6885A9F3-79DD-4228-AF2F-F19EE7D7A3AD
P2860
Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences.
description
2000 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2000年の論文
@ja
2000年学术文章
@wuu
2000年学术文章
@zh
2000年学术文章
@zh-cn
2000年学术文章
@zh-hans
2000年学术文章
@zh-my
2000年学术文章
@zh-sg
2000年學術文章
@yue
2000年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Optimal number of response cat ...... r, and respondent preferences.
@en
Optimal number of response cat ...... r, and respondent preferences.
@nl
type
label
Optimal number of response cat ...... r, and respondent preferences.
@en
Optimal number of response cat ...... r, and respondent preferences.
@nl
prefLabel
Optimal number of response cat ...... r, and respondent preferences.
@en
Optimal number of response cat ...... r, and respondent preferences.
@nl
P1433
P1476
Optimal number of response cat ...... r, and respondent preferences.
@en
P2093
P356
10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00050-5
P577
2000-03-01T00:00:00Z