Limits to health care: fair procedures, democratic deliberation, and the legitimacy problem for insurers.
about
Clinical ethics revisitedPriority setting for new technologies in medicine: a transdisciplinary study.What do hospital decision-makers in Ontario, Canada, have to say about the fairness of priority setting in their institutions?European drug reimbursement systems' legitimacy: five-country comparison and policy tool.One of these things is not like the others: the idea of precedence in health technology assessment and coverage decisionsWho should receive life support during a public health emergency? Using ethical principles to improve allocation decisionsEvaluating priority setting success in healthcare: a pilot study.Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 6: investigating methods to identify, prioritise, implement and evaluate disinvestment projects in a local healthcare setting.Adoption of an innovation to repair aortic aneurysms at a Canadian hospital: a qualitative case study and evaluation.Public involvement in the priority setting activities of a wait time management initiative: a qualitative case studyPriority setting: what constitutes success? A conceptual framework for successful priority setting.In global health research, is it legitimate to stop clinical trials early on account of their opportunity costs?When to start antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings: a human rights analysis.Improving district level health planning and priority setting in Tanzania through implementing accountability for reasonableness framework: Perceptions of stakeholders.Tragic choices in health care: lessons from the child B caseHealthcare rationing-are additional criteria needed for assessing evidence based clinical practice guidelines?Awareness and perceived fairness of Option B+ in Malawi: A population-level perspectiveCombining multicriteria decision analysis, ethics and health technology assessment: applying the EVIDEM decision-making framework to growth hormone for Turner syndrome patientsRecent advances. Medical ethics.Guidelines as rationing tools: a qualitative analysis of psychosocial patient selection criteria for cardiac procedures.Priority setting in health care: a complementary approach.Research for better health: the Panamanian priority-setting experience and the need for a new process.Bridging health technology assessment (HTA) with multicriteria decision analyses (MCDA): field testing of the EVIDEM framework for coverage decisions by a public payer in Canada.Setting priorities in primary health care--on whose conditions? A questionnaire study.The accountability for reasonableness approach to guide priority setting in health systems within limited resources--findings from action research at district level in Kenya, Tanzania, and Zambia.Implementing accountability for reasonableness framework at district level in Tanzania: a realist evaluation.What guidance are researchers given on how to present network meta-analyses to end-users such as policymakers and clinicians? A systematic review.A review of selected research priority setting processes at national level in low and middle income countries: towards fair and legitimate priority setting.Allocating funds for HIV/AIDS: a descriptive study of KwaDukuza, South Africa.Increased fairness in priority setting processes within the health sector: the case of Kapiri-Mposhi District, Zambia.Priority setting in HIV/AIDS control in West Java Indonesia: an evaluation based on the accountability for reasonableness framework.Setting healthcare priorities in hospitals: a review of empirical studiesRationing and life-saving treatments: should identifiable patients have higher priority?Evidence based medicine guidelines: a solution to rationing or politics disguised as science?Ethical issues in funding orphan drug research and development.Role of centralized review processes for making reimbursement decisions on new health technologies in Europe.Legitimacy and fairness in priority setting in Tanzania.Public accountability and sunshine healthcare regulation.Public attitudes and values in priority settingCan the EVIDEM Framework Tackle Issues Raised by Evaluating Treatments for Rare Diseases: Analysis of Issues and Policies, and Context-Specific Adaptation.
P2860
Q24798899-71CD4EE6-BD6E-4FB5-83FE-DFAD9B010CE8Q24799303-B4FD35C0-A3A5-470F-AD22-4D4D53A096BDQ24800220-7BBD258A-E8D7-47BD-A9D3-E025E3340B19Q30224060-3DEFC983-9738-4832-A3F5-9D4C8633F30DQ30350890-1D0BB9B4-AF6E-4FBD-8E9C-58CDCD4F9378Q30374430-296E515B-E432-4204-A704-A11D90FE8682Q30495055-82045D72-B05B-4683-B904-65FF98FB166CQ30853586-9E82C42B-3473-43E6-A486-E25F28E317B5Q33305691-F8E1C03C-15FB-4DBD-910A-FB50F02E1447Q33306136-73D2FB84-3103-48BB-9E26-1E1F3FACF3F1Q33415345-17B3B184-F84F-401D-8964-21F211191E14Q33464933-0D354554-9CA1-4228-BA80-5C2BFB94AC89Q33548096-FCFA0333-40BE-4ACD-91F0-D23485E76037Q33759936-4A26C047-2FA7-4C52-B3F4-BE7FEB737493Q33767847-EF55A9A8-3ABC-4A57-9826-4EB0BE6408EDQ33780861-51B4404A-CE6B-4988-90D7-BD888A3F3C04Q33787646-8D8C05F4-EE43-436E-B999-1D9FFB981DB4Q33797377-A25AF7F5-E594-49A6-8063-E2FC27A89AA2Q33801476-2989EE66-A71C-4F2B-B1BE-135F438A995DQ33955344-20B907C0-D391-4DA6-AC6F-E348B70AA31EQ34012487-95AA416F-BE65-4737-901A-EA428F529FC7Q34065744-FEABB7CA-F89E-4102-ACDB-3479400419D3Q34086884-280C131A-1C4A-4433-8280-946E18C4510BQ34488455-3DAEA9AF-2641-495D-8E5B-633F02E42F66Q34544369-E0791CB2-32EA-4383-A1B9-894D167CFA36Q34585800-56F799F8-571C-4D65-B998-695D1E1B953DQ34724513-A555F720-C506-46D5-8388-18807F85183AQ35047793-2AEF29A8-E991-4306-8376-67FCCADD4237Q35057945-F2F733BD-957C-4E75-9ABF-5C5961CCA4BAQ35096838-5B5F5B22-D7EA-4F64-A2FC-DB02F096EABFQ35150900-AE74B749-68C1-40FC-9628-BA2236129F36Q35159954-3A9F3A79-8203-4C9B-A8ED-E36C83DEBFB4Q35422296-1B91B705-1BD1-4CE7-B60B-A49542C63069Q35425978-2C03CF37-DDBF-42A3-8FE0-83BA4705D3FFQ35429249-BC4DA681-D018-4B5A-B978-159FAB08C563Q35454428-AED57462-C875-407B-97CB-4A1CCAF0ED9EQ35536664-847435AE-CBBA-4A16-B257-14D121863D14Q35539911-0690A605-09FF-430E-900D-8A533E391E27Q35761254-2AD78811-9254-4DE0-8302-CD5BA149F2F5Q35835153-F109701C-5ACC-4B02-97DD-9304B05ABD32
P2860
Limits to health care: fair procedures, democratic deliberation, and the legitimacy problem for insurers.
description
1997 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1997年の論文
@ja
1997年学术文章
@wuu
1997年学术文章
@zh
1997年学术文章
@zh-cn
1997年学术文章
@zh-hans
1997年学术文章
@zh-my
1997年学术文章
@zh-sg
1997年學術文章
@yue
1997年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Limits to health care: fair pr ...... gitimacy problem for insurers.
@en
Limits to health care: fair pr ...... gitimacy problem for insurers.
@nl
type
label
Limits to health care: fair pr ...... gitimacy problem for insurers.
@en
Limits to health care: fair pr ...... gitimacy problem for insurers.
@nl
prefLabel
Limits to health care: fair pr ...... gitimacy problem for insurers.
@en
Limits to health care: fair pr ...... gitimacy problem for insurers.
@nl
P1476
Limits to health care: fair pr ...... gitimacy problem for insurers.
@en
P2093
James Sabin
Norman Daniels
P304
P356
10.1111/J.1088-4963.1997.TB00082.X
P577
1997-01-01T00:00:00Z