Measuring outcomes in aphasia research: A review of current practice and an agenda for standardisation
about
Time for a step change? Improving the efficiency, relevance, reliability, validity and transparency of aphasia rehabilitation research through core outcome measures, a common data set and improved reporting criteria.Evaluating the Benefits of Aphasia Intervention Delivered in Virtual Reality: Results of a Quasi-Randomised Study.Social participation in working-age adults with aphasia: an updated systematic review.Standardized measurement of sensorimotor recovery in stroke trials: Consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable.Validity, reliability and sensitivity of the NORLA-6: Naming and oral reading for language in aphasia 6-point scale.Challenges facing COS development for aphasia.Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health to identify outcome domains for a core outcome set for aphasia: a comparison of stakeholder perspectives.Standardized Measurement of Sensorimotor Recovery in Stroke Trials: Consensus-Based Core Recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable.Which outcomes are most important to people with aphasia and their families? an international nominal group technique study framed within the ICF.Top 10 research priorities relating to aphasia following strokeDiscourse measurement in aphasia: consensus and caveatsA core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: Obstacles, risks, and benefitsLet’s talk real talk: an argument to include conversation in a D-COS for aphasia research with an acknowledgment of the challenges aheadDiscourse measurement in aphasia research: have we reached the tipping point? A core outcome set … or greater standardisation of discourse measures?
P2860
Q30855760-D9A6DC24-5492-452D-A715-344078D8CA0EQ36102762-21562C76-E948-4C41-9424-D81A7AF537D2Q38603482-AE559E5E-DD51-4884-9051-B78ED65CDA3AQ38659128-12DDE86A-CADD-4539-8281-9F9BED181EEAQ38829254-9930FEC8-8F27-473C-B5ED-60B2D31A38E7Q41151291-CEC827B3-8D88-4901-8AD9-4F81818E3319Q47575079-E0BD96C7-B489-436B-9E7B-BCD553DB6341Q51796083-22F485A1-C51D-497B-AD30-00C5721CA656Q55059772-9C3A9847-A1C9-4B16-A071-CA841E380442Q58140101-2825BBF3-2641-4275-9B49-11597761D317Q58142533-9288C51C-80FB-48BE-B6DF-61EFD3F4CE65Q58156292-BF1F33E3-D6E0-44FE-A148-C504446B1BE4Q58251670-E6F1AFAC-9750-44D7-B0A6-2987022A9AF8Q58280989-8B224301-0D74-4287-8EBC-553A108EF234
P2860
Measuring outcomes in aphasia research: A review of current practice and an agenda for standardisation
description
article
@en
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в липні 2014
@uk
name
Measuring outcomes in aphasia ...... an agenda for standardisation
@en
Measuring outcomes in aphasia ...... an agenda for standardisation
@nl
type
label
Measuring outcomes in aphasia ...... an agenda for standardisation
@en
Measuring outcomes in aphasia ...... an agenda for standardisation
@nl
prefLabel
Measuring outcomes in aphasia ...... an agenda for standardisation
@en
Measuring outcomes in aphasia ...... an agenda for standardisation
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
Measuring outcomes in aphasia ...... an agenda for standardisation
@en
P2093
Guylaine Le Dorze
Linda Worrall
Sarah J. Wallace
Tanya Rose
P2860
P304
P356
10.1080/02687038.2014.930262
P577
2014-07-15T00:00:00Z