Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: a systematic review
about
Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User SurveyComplications Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Tear Repair: A Systematic Review of Terms and Definitions With Focus on Shoulder StiffnessEvaluation of interventions for informed consent for randomised controlled trials (ELICIT): protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi surveyEffectiveness of acupuncture and related therapies for palliative care of cancer: overview of systematic reviews.Core Outcome Sets and Multidimensional Assessment Tools for Harmonizing Outcome Measure in Chronic Pain and Back PainCore outcome sets and systematic reviewsMaxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery for cleft lip and palate patientsCore outcome sets for research and clinical practice.A systematic review finds limited data on measurement properties of instruments measuring outcomes in adult intensive care unit survivors.A core outcome set for localised prostate cancer effectiveness trials: protocol for a systematic review of the literature and stakeholder involvement through interviews and a Delphi survey.Collating the knowledge base for core outcome set development: developing and appraising the search strategy for a systematic review.Recommendations for a first Core Outcome Measurement set for complex regional PAin syndrome Clinical sTudies (COMPACT).Core Outcomes and Common Data Elements in Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Systematic Review of the Literature Focusing on Reported Outcomes.Development of a core outcome set for effectiveness trials aimed at optimising prescribing in older adults in care homes.Protocol for the development of a salutogenic intrapartum core outcome set (SIPCOS).The COMET Handbook: version 1.0.Descriptive analysis of cochrane child-relevant systematic reviews: an update and comparison between 2009 and 2013.Citation analysis did not provide a reliable assessment of core outcome set uptakeImproving core outcome set development: qualitative interviews with developers provided pointers to inform guidanceCreation of a core outcome set for clinical trials of people with shoulder pain: a study protocol.The COMET Initiative database: progress and activities from 2011 to 2013.Evaluating outcomes used in cardiothoracic surgery interventional research: a systematic review of reviews to develop a core outcome set.Development of a comprehensive hospital-based elder abuse intervention: an initial systematic scoping reviewMaking randomised trials more efficient: report of the first meeting to discuss the Trial Forge platformCore outcome sets and trial registries.Outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses of appendicitis treatments in children: a systematic review.The Importance of Integration of Stakeholder Views in Core Outcome Set Development: Otitis Media with Effusion in Children with Cleft Palate.Standardised outcomes in nephrology - Haemodialysis (SONG-HD): study protocol for establishing a core outcome set in haemodialysis.Which outcome measures are reported by clinical trials investigating OME treatment? A case for standardised reporting.Prophylactic mesh use during primary stoma formation to prevent parastomal hernia.Reported Outcome Measures in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Systematic Review.Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement.Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and Identification of Gaps.A review of patient and carer participation and the use of qualitative research in the development of core outcome setsA core outcome set for all types of cardiac surgery effectiveness trials: a study protocol for an international eDelphi survey to achieve consensus on what to measure and the subsequent selection of measurement instruments.Identifying research priorities in anaesthesia and perioperative care: final report of the joint National Institute of Academic Anaesthesia/James Lind Alliance Research Priority Setting Partnership.Core domain and outcome measurement sets for shoulder pain trials are needed: systematic review of physical therapy trials.Social network analysis identified central outcomes for core outcome sets using systematic reviews of HIV/AIDSThe use of qualitative methods to inform Delphi surveys in core outcome set developmentDirections for new developments on statistical design and analysis of small population group trials
P2860
Q26771000-2FB92C53-8785-4B83-9B29-B1974184DF95Q26775997-6113CD97-7AD3-4D98-AF90-792BD74B3F5CQ26778351-CB44A4BE-15E0-4F33-B023-BF5CC575DDADQ27305930-CD9877DA-CB77-4E6A-B373-2AA15F8EE8DFQ28066762-0CC1AF16-D0ED-4D64-8CA2-C00C2DA7211DQ28069515-8ABDF35C-C8F5-48B9-A7B3-3D8ECD51F25AQ28278929-C5FBD452-8CF2-4ABC-B610-9E99D7071A49Q30234594-8C5E6120-6764-4375-806E-FBABCA1F5B0DQ30240946-E12FC966-C8AF-4696-9124-09E8D2E54CE8Q30626731-4B232A18-4B0E-4980-B746-18B573BDC2D8Q30639259-6D3E83DD-7155-4A6B-A1BF-4675FC8FE98DQ30852024-C3562EBE-50DC-409E-9ADA-A2B5E74C07BBQ30988678-0CF31605-54FA-4C0D-AB51-BA9AF6EE11DCQ33555917-CA4D904A-199C-4603-BBD9-C645F8B407B9Q33576285-40C5497C-32AD-4CEE-85B4-9B6603ECDB97Q33877196-201B396B-9378-4B1B-8C7F-89E280B6D566Q33892497-A26DB198-4662-4971-B0C7-209A0CE90E8BQ33910843-D18B4ABE-AA53-48E4-B748-1C546A04B9BFQ33910854-3F10FCAB-BD70-43D5-A735-8C85D071C921Q33921710-330FD0B4-4B18-42A9-AD75-6DA6326423EAQ33938597-65271092-3143-428F-828E-63299822FE9FQ35242331-74734038-2D7C-4670-8259-22B83724B08CQ35566825-5BA3CC4C-E621-40E8-ABDC-C7F27B3BE9ECQ35653223-0438DB64-C4C7-45B2-9FA6-E774988CA7CCQ35658444-F4FE15FA-26C4-4D53-905F-5788046C11C2Q35665342-FBEBF81C-7097-4EF9-BFE8-6E428D475A28Q35675722-CDF905B5-D25F-4A8B-A235-C52E29AA9C34Q35977529-6FFD1137-386A-49CA-AC10-A8A778942E04Q36040734-7138AF87-73F5-4A8F-ACBC-1EBAA1E37BCBQ36043006-3DBDB836-C720-402F-A90B-DE9F0AB9BAFFQ36092312-AF7C4885-F05A-4324-9CA1-7CBBA1C259C7Q36166067-9D5F4F68-5D9B-44F8-9608-866FD7CD087FQ36223898-EE426D9F-1CD3-4B53-B244-DAD9BC71B869Q36310440-D8C0F71C-453D-4310-A5B8-AB6EF6852318Q36341040-361B73F3-8E3C-4A12-8FC8-17C5EAE0B59AQ36406215-E88C3918-87C8-49B5-BFBD-9CC2BA9D1F0CQ36459560-52922CEC-640B-4FD5-A4F7-3B00B914530EQ36521959-D5D5B02D-4A5D-4A68-BD90-2899800DA1E8Q36865661-83F8C8B2-E917-43F4-9FFD-F915EF30F07CQ37006526-043D840C-19F1-4703-A806-B9EFBE468B9C
P2860
Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: a systematic review
description
2014 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2014 թուականի Յունիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2014 թվականի հունիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2014年の論文
@ja
2014年論文
@yue
2014年論文
@zh-hant
2014年論文
@zh-hk
2014年論文
@zh-mo
2014年論文
@zh-tw
2014年论文
@wuu
name
Choosing important health outc ...... research: a systematic review
@ast
Choosing important health outc ...... research: a systematic review
@en
Choosing important health outc ...... research: a systematic review
@nl
type
label
Choosing important health outc ...... research: a systematic review
@ast
Choosing important health outc ...... research: a systematic review
@en
Choosing important health outc ...... research: a systematic review
@nl
prefLabel
Choosing important health outc ...... research: a systematic review
@ast
Choosing important health outc ...... research: a systematic review
@en
Choosing important health outc ...... research: a systematic review
@nl
P2093
P2860
P31
P3181
P1433
P1476
Choosing important health outc ...... research: a systematic review
@en
P2093
Binu Gurung
Doug G. Altman
Elizabeth Gargon
Jane M. Blazeby
Mike Clarke
Nancy Medley
P2860
P304
P3181
P356
10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0099111
P407
P577
2014-01-01T00:00:00Z
2014-06-16T00:00:00Z