Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias
about
Do pressures to publish increase scientists' bias? An empirical support from US States DataBehavioural and developmental interventions for autism spectrum disorder: a clinical systematic reviewThe PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaborationDeep impact: unintended consequences of journal rankWhy selective publication of statistically significant results can be effective"Positive" results increase down the Hierarchy of the SciencesAdjunctive atypical antipsychotic treatment for major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of depression, quality of life, and safety outcomesSubjects with colour vision deficiency in the community: what do primary care physicians need to know?Reporting bias in medical research - a narrative reviewCan animal models of disease reliably inform human studies?Lysine supplementation is not effective for the prevention or treatment of feline herpesvirus 1 infection in cats: a systematic reviewNon-absorbable disaccharides versus placebo/no intervention and lactulose versus lactitol for the prevention and treatment of hepatic encephalopathy in people with cirrhosisNon-absorbable disaccharides versus placebo/no intervention and lactulose versus lactitol for the prevention and treatment of hepatic encephalopathy in people with cirrhosisRehabilitation following carpal tunnel releaseTopical and device-based treatments for fungal infections of the toenailsWorkplace interventions to prevent work disability in workers on sick leaveInterventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: oral cryotherapyInterventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: cytokines and growth factorsInterventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: oral cryotherapyBias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventionsBias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventionsThe COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative: Its Role in Improving Cochrane ReviewsSplinting for carpal tunnel syndromeRehabilitation following carpal tunnel releaseIndustry sponsorship and research outcomeExercise and mobilisation interventions for carpal tunnel syndromeErgonomic positioning or equipment for treating carpal tunnel syndromeStatins for multiple sclerosisComparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trialsComparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trialsContinuous quality improvement: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomesA surge of p-values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too)Relating built environment to physical activity: two failures to validateOn the plurality of (methodological) worlds: estimating the analytic flexibility of FMRI experimentsTracking replicability as a method of post-publication open evaluationThe validation of peer review through research impact measures and the implications for funding strategiesQuantifying selective reporting and the Proteus phenomenon for multiple datasets with similar biasThe extent and consequences of p-hacking in scienceThe utility of medico-legal databases for public health research: a systematic review of peer-reviewed publications using the National Coronial Information SystemTransparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network
P2860
Q21090019-EBE0236F-0604-4207-B515-C8F792704DB5Q21092167-6C4FFBCE-A103-4B03-B6F8-7D956B47395FQ21092360-F7CD1668-E8BB-48ED-992A-ED28F550C0F2Q21129393-63187BCD-CAF0-4997-B677-AB464D4C2B6CQ21133013-4BEFCC9E-05C8-4170-914C-D9FB60A730C6Q21136404-2933E72E-9F41-4558-9599-CCDAF110B901Q21144599-5EEBFC00-0431-4560-B6E1-F189A8C9858DQ21146675-D6E71FAB-9602-4629-9B49-584827EBF874Q21203744-E4E6A2E7-C803-469A-89E8-F3EB9AB3F024Q21563449-9FE6BE5A-06DF-4634-A9C8-347D46518F5DQ22000632-54A4E14D-7D4B-443C-AB16-AC4F69152F4EQ24185782-9E6B407C-FEF8-4417-A1D5-7DFBE2DBA4A1Q24185895-F420C0F1-1726-4BC5-901E-53ECA8203AF4Q24186128-04167A21-166E-4F1C-BDD3-375AD19A594AQ24186214-184D17EA-013B-473B-A5F3-5A6F4167D183Q24186650-088E3E86-774D-48A1-B15D-1AF9A575FCA1Q24186965-B5590317-072D-4A7F-A8FC-22AE39EC23AEQ24187456-B32E213C-DDFA-48E8-B28F-733AC4BAC05DQ24188283-8560F0FE-3019-4653-A2F1-853500B8F0DBQ24193207-4B357216-B1F1-4C5A-9A60-68F6789734DDQ24198908-A67DE4E5-DB8D-4965-8916-17B26C7A7FF7Q24199056-ACE0D145-34AB-482D-91EB-F71B44AEE5E9Q24201978-41026E2B-59B2-4FA5-8A3B-EC26C493D0A1Q24202176-5D069F6B-D171-437D-A9BE-3088D1AE172BQ24202591-C243B9EE-347E-4E17-AC9E-5BF2C7383256Q24202621-82E08CC2-BB08-4973-AB49-0466BFCCAD00Q24203852-9BF2828A-237B-4116-8D93-25BE64DC51C9Q24234119-6A15B3EB-E9CC-4CEC-9143-6A00B17CAF84Q24235035-3EA42AFD-9403-43E4-82BB-22A3AA9C422CQ24235210-6495814C-1B67-469F-B438-605C69264A56Q24241182-BC72C1BF-CBE4-4262-82B1-4DD44DD5B875Q24273251-F0333FE8-EFFB-43EF-B647-5CD5378673C6Q24273312-8C5ECD22-2472-4155-A8E3-4E424693951FQ24273352-7D5F1F71-D73A-415F-B40E-3A9DAFA166BFQ24273360-CC9A1672-C24E-4DF1-9068-28FD66B0394EQ24288679-5725AE9A-721B-444D-894C-A52CD446DCA9Q24288719-859DE54C-8D65-4CAF-BF66-1E4E33E8972EQ24288794-40D6781D-283F-4C4A-B848-76D8E7905B35Q24288869-AB848309-7AAA-4EEA-B940-E6BC5FE6F978Q24288938-749B6423-3AAF-4F64-A676-0D50FEAD75A4
P2860
Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias
description
2008 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2008 թուականի Օգոստոսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2008 թվականի օգոստոսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2008年の論文
@ja
2008年論文
@yue
2008年論文
@zh-hant
2008年論文
@zh-hk
2008年論文
@zh-mo
2008年論文
@zh-tw
2008年论文
@wuu
name
Systematic review of the empir ...... ias and outcome reporting bias
@ast
Systematic review of the empir ...... ias and outcome reporting bias
@en
type
label
Systematic review of the empir ...... ias and outcome reporting bias
@ast
Systematic review of the empir ...... ias and outcome reporting bias
@en
prefLabel
Systematic review of the empir ...... ias and outcome reporting bias
@ast
Systematic review of the empir ...... ias and outcome reporting bias
@en
P2093
P2860
P31
P921
P3181
P1433
P1476
Systematic review of the empir ...... ias and outcome reporting bias
@en
P2093
Decullier E
Easterbrook PJ
Ioannidis JP
P2860
P3181
P356
10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0003081
P407
P577
2008-08-28T00:00:00Z