Reporting methods in studies developing prognostic models in cancer: a review. - sprookjes - yvandenbroek - TriplyDB

Reporting methods in studies developing prognostic models in cancer: a review.

Reporting methods in studies developing prognostic models in cancer: a review.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q30494142

about

Reporting and methods in clinical prediction research: a systematic review Developing risk prediction models for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of methodology and reporting Prediction models for the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting STRengthening analytical thinking for observational studies: the STRATOS initiative Design Characteristics Influence Performance of Clinical Prediction Rules in Validation: A Meta-Epidemiological Study Diagnostic and prognostic prediction models Clinical Prediction Models for Cardiovascular Disease: Tufts Predictive Analytics and Comparative Effectiveness Clinical Prediction Model Database Improving the transparency of prognosis research: the role of reporting, data sharing, registration, and protocols Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 3: prognostic model research Developing Risk Prediction Models for Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: a Systematic Review of Methodology and Reporting Quality External validation of multivariable prediction models: a systematic review of methodological conduct and reporting Overview of data-synthesis in systematic reviews of studies on outcome prediction models.Critical appraisal and data extraction for systematic reviews of prediction modelling studies: the CHARMS checklist.Discrimination-based sample size calculations for multivariable prognostic models for time-to-event data.Reporting performance of prognostic models in cancer: a review.Formal and informal prediction of recurrent stroke and myocardial infarction after stroke: a systematic review and evaluation of clinical prediction models in a new cohort An independent and external validation of QRISK2 cardiovascular disease risk score: a prospective open cohort study The General Weakness Syndrome Therapy (GymNAST) study: protocol for a cohort study on recovery on walking function External validation of a Cox prognostic model: principles and methods Blood Component Therapy and Coagulopathy in Trauma: A Systematic Review of the Literature from the Trauma Update Group.Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement.Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. The TRIPOD Group.Preoperative and early postoperative quality of life after major surgery - a prospective observational study.Formation of translational risk score based on correlation coefficients as an alternative to Cox regression models for predicting outcome in patients with NSCLC Prognostic models in acute pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis Risk factors for invasive fungal disease in critically ill adult patients: a systematic review.Which hospice patients with cancer are able to die in the setting of their choice? Results of a retrospective cohort study.The art versus science of predicting prognosis: can a prognostic index predict short-term mortality better than experienced nurses do?Refining Prognosis in Lung Cancer: A Report on the Quality and Relevance of Clinical Prognostic Tools.Frequency, impact, and predictors of persistent pain after root canal treatment: a national dental PBRN study.A secure distributed logistic regression protocol for the detection of rare adverse drug events Assessment of the extent of unpublished studies in prognostic factor research: a systematic review of p53 immunohistochemistry in bladder cancer as an example Quantifying the impact of different approaches for handling continuous predictors on the performance of a prognostic model.Characteristics and Validation Techniques for PCA-Based Gene-Expression Signatures.Prognostic models for predicting mortality in elderly ICU patients: a systematic review.A systematic review of breast cancer incidence risk prediction models with meta-analysis of their performance.A systematic review of case-mix adjustment models for stroke.Pilot prognostic model of extremely poor survival among high-risk hepatocellular carcinoma patients.Fracture risk assessment: state of the art, methodologically unsound, or poorly reported?Risk prediction tools in surgical oncology.

P2860

Q21092318-053F533C-BBDD-4C13-89CE-EB6E8CA0574A Q21245257-04A5EAE5-4EC1-4C57-B86F-C24276E852C9 Q24194210-14D37EDF-E420-497B-AB3A-B6CAE4139322 Q24289520-46DF1488-04BA-474B-BBAE-5E22DC9DD2DD Q26770973-D195901B-C43E-4721-A5E9-CC8A79129EF3 Q26827577-2066BB29-E9F7-4FA2-9086-83CF13B59040 Q28646602-C793F4AD-F393-4473-AD0F-4CD4EF44F2C0 Q28655983-074C349B-0D0A-4049-8076-5DFE3E001B16 Q28709215-82EFE531-ED93-4EDD-B314-E4AC63DFB736 Q30359759-90D5092F-E925-458E-91CD-AEC290AE68EF Q30577024-585C9C11-17D5-41E0-8FAE-B01897C17F54 Q30599542-CBA3F60B-A089-45A4-B7CF-6E52A7A68C75 Q30860218-BBA3D9E4-C91F-4C6F-B346-03998FF5714C Q31004558-41F61113-6C56-4D10-9FF1-69A7F5BC43AA Q33547696-47B251A9-E158-4B77-889A-39AC6B286BD3 Q33616677-B3AF128C-D4D7-4F0B-96AB-DF87196B7FE9 Q33848884-69C8ACA0-C24A-4BF1-89F9-7F52E05622B7 Q34417174-ACB51CA2-910D-4477-AEBC-C26F48F15114 Q34621957-44E2D906-146D-4BDE-B545-239AB72A78B9 Q34679034-A0314EF4-F246-4A8C-A25D-E85217E7F860 Q34837497-BD86289B-7A17-4C6D-8AC5-3E81CC2FEB79 Q34978306-E191AB42-6685-4DA5-A67F-8FC3969782FA Q35097573-C1D0DFB2-BC46-4C90-AFA9-659E85251B90 Q35166543-F89850CE-19DB-48F4-8162-D4313F4BB8F9 Q36003924-2F80120F-0E1D-42EC-8FAE-957BD9B418EB Q36073057-CDF68FF4-7351-46B8-9359-717F25C207A8 Q36110687-2B144DD6-F02C-4B51-B806-53E04C3F6BC5 Q36131568-A177B8B9-C1BA-4967-8D16-4CF22BE75C50 Q36258014-9F3CFAA8-A3EF-4D33-9603-F6754BD737D0 Q36386440-25607987-919A-454B-9EF5-0B8BD0BDB7F7 Q36771100-AF6AD762-46E9-4927-A775-D60FE421E0B7 Q37236560-4BF3F9B5-8E17-41A0-AEEB-B9292A70F9A1 Q37261771-C1972477-5071-47AD-A238-8AF3642A6E3C Q37652541-ED9CCEDC-7D94-4EE3-9554-0B3B4455C86F Q37885817-84D66DC1-231A-430B-9D7B-4FE6C7A63B6A Q37950847-6B8B7248-0A13-4491-AF7C-4D017F33654C Q37976891-BF8E65B8-BB6A-4051-B45F-163E227D4199 Q38014764-C350A4BD-A9B6-4B50-BE78-AFA7210F07FA Q38017952-4E31387A-353D-47E6-963A-9EE2C151CF2E Q38224326-16E88E38-392A-4209-A762-EBF033F75578

P2860

Reporting methods in studies developing prognostic models in cancer: a review.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q30494142

description

2010 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2010 թուականի Մարտին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած

@hyw

2010 թվականի մարտին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված

@hy

2010年の論文

@ja

2010年論文

@yue

2010年論文

@zh-hant

2010年論文

@zh-hk

2010年論文

@zh-mo

2010年論文

@zh-tw

2010年论文

@wuu

name

Reporting methods in studies developing prognostic models in cancer: a review.

@ast

Reporting methods in studies developing prognostic models in cancer: a review.

@en

type

label

Reporting methods in studies developing prognostic models in cancer: a review.

@ast

Reporting methods in studies developing prognostic models in cancer: a review.

@en

prefLabel

Reporting methods in studies developing prognostic models in cancer: a review.

@ast

Reporting methods in studies developing prognostic models in cancer: a review.

@en

P1433

Q30494142-CE121FDE-DFB9-4132-91D9-6FE0EA0D1BF1

P1476

Q30494142-7C38E3FE-AE01-463E-90FF-2481B4FB00C8

P2093

Q30494142-1727FF73-A67A-4DE8-9614-68EF299F90C0

Q30494142-9F9D3F32-202E-452B-A07B-AD606D0FEE74

Q30494142-F894086B-C050-48CE-B9CB-E35E8C34D642

P275

Q30494142-77E939C5-A50B-4B7A-BC69-323CE9586C6E

P2860

Q30494142-00A4DA4C-DE52-4BB0-BB5D-BA6BA9CCBC01

Q30494142-0460C498-E608-486A-B2DE-EFA036E0E07A

Q30494142-0521222D-01CC-425E-8B33-369B15486D73

Q30494142-0EA2BACE-3227-4C43-BCDE-75B9C4A3E1E3

Q30494142-1233A177-96E3-4B4D-B97D-FFE7B41E88C7

Q30494142-1380E3F0-D1D1-4FF9-8F4A-0C33EB91937B

Q30494142-20EEBB72-18E5-4D80-BD96-86C72680856F

Q30494142-2274B319-1DAF-4944-87E5-BD1B52E0BFDA

Q30494142-2E27D2E0-8B1C-4810-9200-170521EE1893

Q30494142-33CE967A-FE8D-45CD-8AEE-C3C871C9ED95

P2888

Q30494142-67D52E6F-D60B-4E79-9BDB-E714094E5EEA

P304

Q30494142-BB1A8793-3642-462D-A262-6D09106227C8

P31

Q30494142-409B11AA-13F7-4A08-AD91-3D01DB0186A4

Q30494142-4CA765A5-46C5-4C7F-AB8D-52062EBDF5F5

P356

Q30494142-64BF5047-A21A-4A9C-A0BA-A57A6658BA28

P407

Q30494142-AE23B9C3-D2D2-494A-9030-2F002EFE59CC

P478

Q30494142-091FCB54-B36F-4398-9BA4-5EDA97A93220

P50

Q30494142-5A17AE99-314F-49B3-B052-EB182BF3CCA6

Q30494142-CB301881-E9E4-4BAD-86B5-DE1AF25FE13C

P5008

Q30494142-ED12702B-E0D6-49B8-8ECC-27DFD88F29F8

P577

Q30494142-6FCE8908-4A27-4601-AB3A-D41FE304EEE3

P5875

Q30494142-61F88639-44BC-467F-977D-4FD589F72B27

P6179

Q30494142-3DBB9FE2-ABD2-467C-BAF2-0F7937F4A46F

P698

Q30494142-799BA6EF-5B15-4C7E-B469-464707B8EFCE

P921

Q30494142-FA3B134B-7BB1-4DE1-9D44-AC198D148201

P932

Q30494142-754CF21D-364A-463D-9DCE-49D6514DD4C1

P356

P1433

P1476

Reporting methods in studies developing prognostic models in cancer: a review.

@en

P2093

Rachel Waters

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Susan Dutton

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Susan Mallett

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P275

Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic

P2860

The University of California, San Francisco Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score: a straightforward and reliable preoperative predictor of disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy

Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound prognostic studies in MEDLINE: an analytic survey

Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles

Assessment and comparison of prognostic classification schemes for survival data.

Searching for clinical prediction rules in MEDLINE

Potential for selection bias with tumor tissue retrieval in molecular epidemiology studies.

Missing covariate data within cancer prognostic studies: a review of current reporting and proposed guidelines

Clinical model to predict survival in chemonaive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with third-generation chemotherapy regimens based on eastern cooperative oncology group data.

Risk-group definition by recursive partitioning analysis of patients with squamous cell head and neck carcinoma treated with surgery and postoperative radiotherapy.

Reporting performance of prognostic models in cancer: a review.

P2888

P304

20

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1186/1741-7015-8-20

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

P478

8

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Douglas G. Altman

Patrick Royston

P5008

P577

2010-03-30T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

42767760

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P6179

1029966578

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

20353578

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

P932

2856521

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string