Fracture risk assessment: state of the art, methodologically unsound, or poorly reported?
about
External validation of multivariable prediction models: a systematic review of methodological conduct and reportingExternal validation and comparison of three prediction tools for risk of osteoporotic fractures using data from population based electronic health records: retrospective cohort study.Comparison of fracture risk prediction by the US Preventive Services Task Force strategy and two alternative strategies in women 50-64 years old in the Women's Health Initiative.Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement.Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. The TRIPOD Group.Fragility fracture: recent developments in risk assessment.Osteoporosis: the emperor has no clothesAssessing fracture risk in people with MS: a service development study comparing three fracture risk scoring systemsExternal validation of clinical prediction models using big datasets from e-health records or IPD meta-analysis: opportunities and challenges.Conflicts at the heart of the FRAX tool.Risk assessment tools to identify women with increased risk of osteoporotic fracture: complexity or simplicity? A systematic review.Novel assessment tools for osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment.Climacteric commentaries.Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement.Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement.Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement.Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement.
P2860
Q30577024-B72C420D-5C90-4CA6-8974-81894E120298Q31155466-A10C0C4A-8007-42D7-8DBE-C4E751A4BE51Q34628366-8D29A33D-F69A-4578-A211-F3A501BAC6EEQ34837497-99605482-88F2-4DCE-B876-21C6169A5CECQ34978306-4DF74DF8-70FD-4F19-9F6D-9473BF1E3CAEQ35039567-11A29A25-31A8-4547-A129-6E88A6AB5676Q35835844-221AF4C3-5904-47BA-AA7C-C8CA000D7DFFQ36730259-93F38948-E788-4EB4-8AFB-A7A38A72CD0FQ37028590-D75193C9-50B2-41A0-8DD0-C822711868C4Q37591552-C44D6486-6AAA-424F-B1C4-90786DD4B2C7Q38099603-E0958394-2908-46C0-B3F9-D94E489A0EB7Q38216229-9FF72467-CB59-436A-808C-95DE7C3DA339Q43819942-431458E0-56C0-43B7-AAE4-81A5113F7178Q51150112-02CFA63D-7447-4565-A34B-8D08DCE121AFQ51150478-7909F73C-0957-4ECA-9DF4-B8EF73861564Q51152907-4AF41478-6A92-417D-98AC-575053AD92DCQ51157282-11EDB9A6-DE06-4A05-A707-2C2235F19AFD
P2860
Fracture risk assessment: state of the art, methodologically unsound, or poorly reported?
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articol științific
@ro
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@gl
artigo científico
@pt
artigo científico
@pt-br
artikel ilmiah
@id
artikull shkencor
@sq
artículo científico
@es
name
Fracture risk assessment: state of the art, methodologically unsound, or poorly reported?
@en
type
label
Fracture risk assessment: state of the art, methodologically unsound, or poorly reported?
@en
prefLabel
Fracture risk assessment: state of the art, methodologically unsound, or poorly reported?
@en
P2860
P1476
Fracture risk assessment: state of the art, methodologically unsound, or poorly reported?
@en
P2860
P2888
P304
P356
10.1007/S11914-012-0108-1
P577
2012-09-01T00:00:00Z
P6179
1037900102