Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists.
about
Cancer diagnostic classifiers based on quantitative DNA methylationAdvantages of evaluating mean nuclear volume as an adjunct parameter in prostate cancer.DNA methylation gene-based models indicating independent poor outcome in prostate cancer.Active surveillance for the management of localized prostate cancer: Guideline recommendationsThe Quantitative Criteria Based on the Fractal Dimensions, Entropy, and Lacunarity for the Spatial Distribution of Cancer Cell Nuclei Enable Identification of Low or High Aggressive Prostate Carcinomas.Prognostic histopathological and molecular markers on prostate cancer needle-biopsies: a reviewOn the relationship between tumor structure and complexity of the spatial distribution of cancer cell nuclei: a fractal geometrical model of prostate carcinoma.Computer-Aided Image Analysis and Fractal Synthesis in the Quantitative Evaluation of Tumor Aggressiveness in Prostate CarcinomasGleason grading challenges in the diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma: experience of a single institution.Effect of pathologic revision and Ki67 and ERG immunohistochemistry on predicting radical prostatectomy outcome in men initially on active surveillance.Gleason inflation 1998-2011: a registry study of 97,168 men.Prognostic implications of 2005 Gleason grade modification. Population-based study of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.Pathology Imagebase-a reference image database for standardization of pathology.Prostate cancer antigen-3 (PCA3) and PCA3-based nomograms in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: an external validation of Hansen's nomogram on a Norwegian cohort.Ability of PITX2 methylation to predict survival in patients with prostate cancer.Interpathologist concordance in the histological diagnosis of focal prostatic atrophy lesions, acute and chronic prostatitis, PIN, and prostate cancer.On complexity and homogeneity measures in predicting biological aggressiveness of prostate cancer; Implication of the cellular automata model of tumor growth.Translationally controlled tumor protein in prostatic adenocarcinoma: correlation with tumor grading and treatment-related changes.The reasons behind variation in Gleason grading of prostatic biopsies: areas of agreement and misconception among 266 European pathologists.Gleason grade 4 prostate adenocarcinoma patterns: an interobserver agreement study among genitourinary pathologists.Accuracy of prostate biopsies for predicting Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimens: nationwide trends 2000-2012.Handling and reporting of transperineal template prostate biopsy in Europe: a web-based survey by the European Network of Uropathology (ENUP).[Objective grading of prostate carcinoma based on fractal dimensions: Gleason 3 + 4= 7a ≠ Gleason 4 + 3 =7b].Presence of invasive cribriform or intraductal growth at biopsy outperforms percentage grade 4 in predicting outcome of Gleason score 3+4=7 prostate cancer.On cribriform prostate cancer.DNA methylation ofPITX2predicts poor survival in men with prostate cancerClinical significance of subtypes of Gleason pattern 4 prostate cancer
P2860
Q27012960-6B12C694-EA0E-48E0-8BE0-3123F1F8FEB2Q33874522-599CD19D-CF55-435B-AED4-2B3C1D888596Q34174356-D2DAE907-9916-4CA5-B281-AFD2AB8D4196Q35725546-DFD0CECB-195A-453E-A2AC-2EE76D14F7A1Q36568781-190D15DD-1B33-4731-8A6E-79AD3B0529DBQ38253055-850EDC10-184C-49C0-ACC3-C617AFCDD61AQ38302346-8F21857A-5FFF-4D06-A6F1-0FC86AF192B2Q38446649-AD7E9547-C32C-412B-9D34-90EB19EE8E48Q38632033-059EA0CA-29FC-4ADB-87AA-57D00BE960FBQ38764526-8D5E1287-2079-4D39-9B88-7DECD149F64FQ39199397-0A3F1FB6-DF9B-44E7-800B-1E3CB176C093Q39501766-08EBB6E3-DD72-4183-BD94-D526A616DE17Q40116896-A6CFBA4F-C959-4D43-98ED-FDADD1AF7646Q40216437-6D865153-4D9B-4BBB-9C4A-50DAF48252C4Q40230694-B29F4662-259E-4FD1-856B-02B708D5DADFQ40244370-5BBC44D6-5CB7-459C-B468-75519E36D730Q40437169-D4877B38-9371-4C5C-AC23-45907A137D4FQ43125303-845EE234-E17D-452A-A040-B86C079ECDDBQ44345074-8E1CECB9-F31D-4859-A315-6D040957635DQ46393657-1CCED0BA-81DB-4824-B7DB-67C36079B961Q48062857-76C0AF2C-5423-459B-879F-D6574E2B29D2Q50073783-E7139DC7-DA17-4C5A-A6E6-DED5873E3F96Q53149206-539FAE89-BC1A-48C3-9DF1-DF832756358EQ54349639-D559909B-9DBC-4E6F-BA47-C843A65E6F23Q55020762-0DB9C650-CCB4-47F0-9CDB-52FC78805480Q58327420-216386BB-EBFE-4E56-9A1F-7000AECA7115Q58562217-60C83C82-F11B-42E6-84CC-68E8A348FBA2
P2860
Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists.
description
2013 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2013 թուականի Յունուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2013 թվականի հունվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2013年の論文
@ja
2013年論文
@yue
2013年論文
@zh-hant
2013年論文
@zh-hk
2013年論文
@zh-mo
2013年論文
@zh-tw
2013年论文
@wuu
name
Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists.
@ast
Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists.
@en
Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists.
@nl
type
label
Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists.
@ast
Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists.
@en
Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists.
@nl
prefLabel
Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists.
@ast
Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists.
@en
Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists
@en
P2093
Amar S Ahmad
Andrew J Evans
Antonio Lopez-Beltran
Ben Vainer
Cord Langner
David Griffiths
Eva Compérat
Ferran Algaba
Glen Kristiansen
Liliane Boccon-Gibod
P2860
P304
P356
10.1111/HIS.12008
P577
2013-01-01T00:00:00Z