The potential impact of reproducibility of Gleason grading in men with early stage prostate cancer managed by active surveillance: a multi-institutional study.
about
Molecular classification of prostate cancer progression: foundation for marker-driven treatment of prostate cancerOutcomes of Active Surveillance for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer in the Prospective, Multi-Institutional Canary PASS Cohort.Seventh Joint Meeting of K-J-CaP and CaPSURE: extending the global initiative to improve prostate cancer management.Active surveillance in men with low-risk prostate cancer: current and future challenges.Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists.Identification of proteomic biomarkers predicting prostate cancer aggressiveness and lethality despite biopsy-sampling error.Methylome-wide Sequencing Detects DNA Hypermethylation Distinguishing Indolent from Aggressive Prostate CancerRole of active surveillance in the management of localized prostate cancer.The Quantitative Criteria Based on the Fractal Dimensions, Entropy, and Lacunarity for the Spatial Distribution of Cancer Cell Nuclei Enable Identification of Low or High Aggressive Prostate Carcinomas.Applying precision medicine to the active surveillance of prostate cancer.Urinary TMPRSS2:ERG and PCA3 in an active surveillance cohort: results from a baseline analysis in the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study.Nationwide prevalence of lymph node metastases in Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6 prostate cancer.Prognostic histopathological and molecular markers on prostate cancer needle-biopsies: a reviewOn the relationship between tumor structure and complexity of the spatial distribution of cancer cell nuclei: a fractal geometrical model of prostate carcinoma.Blinded review of archival radical prostatectomy specimens supports that contemporary Gleason score 6 prostate cancer lacks metastatic potential.Recent advances in prostate cancer pathology: Gleason grading and beyond.miRNAs dysregulated in association with Gleason grade regulate extracellular matrix, cytoskeleton and androgen receptor pathways.Accuracy of Grading Gleason Score 7 Prostatic Adenocarcinoma on Needle Biopsy: Influence of Percent Pattern 4 and Other Histological Factors.Can Prostate-Specific Antigen Kinetics before Prostate Biopsy Predict the Malignant Potential of Prostate Cancer?On complexity and homogeneity measures in predicting biological aggressiveness of prostate cancer; Implication of the cellular automata model of tumor growth.The use of targeted MR-guided prostate biopsy reduces the risk of Gleason upgrading on radical prostatectomy.Differences in Upgrading of Prostate Cancer in Prostatectomies between Community and Academic PracticesWhole Slide Imaging Versus Microscopy for Primary Diagnosis in Surgical Pathology: A Multicenter Blinded Randomized Noninferiority Study of 1992 Cases (Pivotal Study).Gleason grade 4 prostate adenocarcinoma patterns: an interobserver agreement study among genitourinary pathologists.Disease-specific survival of patients with invasive cribriform and intraductal prostate cancer at diagnostic biopsy.Presence of invasive cribriform or intraductal growth at biopsy outperforms percentage grade 4 in predicting outcome of Gleason score 3+4=7 prostate cancer.On cribriform prostate cancer.Risk of upgrading from prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy pathology: Is magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy more accurate?Clinical significance of subtypes of Gleason pattern 4 prostate cancer
P2860
Q27024775-C5F794BC-C026-4992-9EB1-3DD9600C9358Q27308897-8873C648-BE83-4BAE-B22B-95D7EA6CDF89Q33905899-1B22DC3B-5FD4-41FB-9BC3-6CDAA406957FQ34448113-BDA41BE7-9395-4AD5-9A34-1958E7343C99Q34512822-5BB14187-A8C0-4240-9E1C-D60F87345AA3Q35678391-1A8D8F9C-7279-491B-998E-C1A09744EBF6Q36386969-A6BE8F79-D12A-435A-8A25-DAD6F012B47CQ36520452-53D70C38-6F48-4EE8-B761-5968110631C1Q36568781-68F0926E-7995-44CE-B8DF-50E1DE3E3256Q36592871-F08CC47B-2439-4B09-8B66-B6DBB12185E2Q36907574-58528FBE-705A-4D65-9766-0CEB582E6C52Q38209526-A6A2FD8F-DA85-426D-8BD1-7B207790CACCQ38253055-CAB44C24-0848-4EEC-9E77-B455AE5FC921Q38302346-6F0B1429-04B0-4842-95FF-E24536A41303Q38374235-BB0A8C67-05DC-4685-BBB0-396809F0EAEFQ38779933-65625461-D689-4722-828E-AA5E36E8E05BQ38870815-9DC53E1C-76AC-463D-B460-FD44381412A5Q39117439-4F34FD92-E69D-4BC9-B164-E3AD80E3968BQ40320507-7A92AFB3-C4B5-4376-81FF-78B3C0AFEFEBQ40437169-AF117150-97D6-435B-8950-7BE4866A22E4Q41715814-5FBC246B-8612-4269-9C70-863BA226F6B9Q42861729-0484E30A-AAD4-42AB-B9CE-D3B97C8B013DQ45068800-44D302A8-3FF8-44BE-82C9-90990642D44CQ46393657-ADB33429-7659-4D08-8D45-29BF82411A72Q53159761-F1EEF8CA-55D8-4EE1-9BA0-3089CF593304Q54349639-A5879781-115F-4874-ACEF-3BD9A846E16DQ55020762-E1053254-6DC5-409C-AB86-8AE451173A0DQ57493779-046D4893-BF9A-425D-BED9-16AAD11740BFQ58562217-3A2BE56E-555F-4FFC-8CF2-6BC5157983D5
P2860
The potential impact of reproducibility of Gleason grading in men with early stage prostate cancer managed by active surveillance: a multi-institutional study.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 15 June 2011
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
The potential impact of reprod ...... : a multi-institutional study.
@en
The potential impact of reprod ...... : a multi-institutional study.
@nl
type
label
The potential impact of reprod ...... : a multi-institutional study.
@en
The potential impact of reprod ...... : a multi-institutional study.
@nl
prefLabel
The potential impact of reprod ...... : a multi-institutional study.
@en
The potential impact of reprod ...... : a multi-institutional study.
@nl
P2093
P1476
The potential impact of reprod ...... : a multi-institutional study.
@en
P2093
Canary/Early Detection Research Network Prostate Active Surveillance Study Investigators
Dean Troyer
Funda Vakar-Lopez
James D Brooks
Jeff Simko
Jesse K McKenney
Ladan Fazli
Lakshmi P Kunju
Lawrence D True
Lisa F Newcomb
P304
P356
10.1016/J.JURO.2011.03.115
P407
P577
2011-06-15T00:00:00Z