Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill
Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532 (1985), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that:
* certain public-sector employees can have a property interest in their employment, per Constitutional Due Process. See Board of Regents v. Roth
* this property right entails a right to "some kind of hearing" before being terminated—a right to oral or written notice of charges against them, an explanation of the employer's evidence, and an opportunity to present their sides of the story.
* thus, the pretermination hearing should be an initial check against mistaken decisions—not a full evidentiary hearing, but essentially a determination of whether there are reasonable grounds to believe that the charges against the employee are true and support the propo
470 U.S. 532Academic tenure in North AmericaCleveland Bd. of Ed. v. LoudermillCleveland Bd. of Educ. v. LoudermillCleveland Board of Education v. LaFleurCleveland Board of Education v LoudermillList of United States Supreme Court cases by the Burger CourtLoudermill hearingLoudermill letterLoudermill rightLoudermill v. Cleveland Board of Education
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill
Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532 (1985), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that:
* certain public-sector employees can have a property interest in their employment, per Constitutional Due Process. See Board of Regents v. Roth
* this property right entails a right to "some kind of hearing" before being terminated—a right to oral or written notice of charges against them, an explanation of the employer's evidence, and an opportunity to present their sides of the story.
* thus, the pretermination hearing should be an initial check against mistaken decisions—not a full evidentiary hearing, but essentially a determination of whether there are reasonable grounds to believe that the charges against the employee are true and support the propo
has abstract
Cleveland Board of Education v ...... efore terminating an employee.
@en
Wikipage page ID
10,799,428
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
895,896,223
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill,
@en
Concurrence
Marshall
@en
Concurrence/Dissent
Brennan
@en
cornell
DecideDate
DecideYear
Dissent
Rehnquist
@en
fullname
Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, et al.
@en
JoinMajority
Burger, Blackmun, Powell, Stevens, O'Connor; Brennan ; Marshall
@en
justia
LawsApplied
U.S. Const. amend. XIV, Ohio Rev. Code Ann. Sec. 124.34
@en
Litigants
Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill
@en
majority
White
@en
ParallelCitations
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
Cleveland Board of Education v ...... are true and support the propo
@en
label
Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill
@en
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
@en
Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, et al.
@en