Comparison of anionic and cationic trypsinogens: The anionic activation domain is more flexible in solution and differs in its mode of BPTI binding in the crystal structure
about
Direct-coupling analysis of residue coevolution captures native contacts across many protein familiesStructural evidence for regulation and specificity of flaviviral proteases and evolution of theFlaviviridaefoldThe energetic cost of induced fit catalysis: Crystal structures of trypsinogen mutants with enhanced activity and inhibitor affinityStructure of a serine protease poised to resynthesize a peptide bondLong-range Electrostatic Complementarity Governs Substrate Recognition by Human Chymotrypsin C, a Key Regulator of Digestive Enzyme ActivationProtein sectors: evolutionary units of three-dimensional structureCharacterizing structural features of cuticle-degrading proteases from fungi by molecular modeling.Bi-factor analysis based on noise-reduction (BIFANR): a new algorithm for detecting coevolving amino acid sites in proteins.Invertebrate trypsins: a review.Expression of human cationic trypsinogen with an authentic N terminus using intein-mediated splicing in aminopeptidase P deficient Escherichia coli.Structural and functional parameters of the flaviviral protease: a promising antiviral drug target.Crystal structure of a subtilisin-like serine proteinase from a psychrotrophic Vibrio species reveals structural aspects of cold adaptation.Cloning and molecular modeling of duodenase with respect to evolution of substrate specificity within mammalian serine proteases that have lost a conserved active-site disulfide bond.The flow and fate of digestive enzymes in the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus.Elements of coevolution in biological sequences.Structural features of the interfaces in enzyme-inhibitor complexes.
P2860
Q24627074-9221F797-6DE9-460A-9F25-A50387BDEF25Q27485166-55F873DF-6E5B-4DD5-BF31-E1E0CA2EC3D8Q27632749-F1E1EAC0-0BD6-41C5-B3EC-6D2EB94065DDQ27643959-85C556D5-1114-4728-B9C7-7D55A1468D44Q27676497-C4189F5E-63E0-4412-9BDD-334D7EF961D4Q28256199-81D04B3A-A4E6-4A83-9205-6A7552B46EBCQ33285061-7C045887-E2DF-4449-AE90-25CB1A11EF1FQ35053259-59C435A4-F703-46D0-857F-B7B859719FBBQ37135397-A655B2A2-D5B5-441B-899B-778CAEA31DF5Q38605810-0B80CECF-7A7B-4115-A260-B4326D00DEC1Q39817292-8996AA90-5027-4CEB-A96C-F318601BA2AAQ43017100-0583CF50-F10A-4D8F-9B4A-C3508E212B82Q46614230-67B057BB-ADE5-43FE-BCD7-758595023C54Q48252624-3F29F470-9CE8-42DC-AECF-2D016766C3EAQ50989250-D44EEA03-62D9-4D79-9916-8968F4731C58Q51697390-C097B668-F123-42A7-9AE5-2BF125A74724
P2860
Comparison of anionic and cationic trypsinogens: The anionic activation domain is more flexible in solution and differs in its mode of BPTI binding in the crystal structure
description
1999 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1999 թուականի Յունուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
1999 թվականի հունվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
1999年の論文
@ja
1999年論文
@yue
1999年論文
@zh-hant
1999年論文
@zh-hk
1999年論文
@zh-mo
1999年論文
@zh-tw
1999年论文
@wuu
name
Comparison of anionic and cati ...... nding in the crystal structure
@ast
Comparison of anionic and cati ...... nding in the crystal structure
@en
Comparison of anionic and cati ...... nding in the crystal structure
@nl
type
label
Comparison of anionic and cati ...... nding in the crystal structure
@ast
Comparison of anionic and cati ...... nding in the crystal structure
@en
Comparison of anionic and cati ...... nding in the crystal structure
@nl
prefLabel
Comparison of anionic and cati ...... nding in the crystal structure
@ast
Comparison of anionic and cati ...... nding in the crystal structure
@en
Comparison of anionic and cati ...... nding in the crystal structure
@nl
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
Comparison of anionic and cati ...... nding in the crystal structure
@en
P2093
A Pasternak
L Hedstrom
P2860
P356
10.1110/PS.8.1.253
P50
P577
1999-01-01T00:00:00Z