Distinguishing direct versus indirect transcription factor-DNA interactions.
about
Fkh1 and Fkh2 bind multiple chromosomal elements in the S. cerevisiae genome with distinct specificities and cell cycle dynamicsAccurate inference of transcription factor binding from DNA sequence and chromatin accessibility dataScerTF: a comprehensive database of benchmarked position weight matrices for Saccharomyces speciesYeTFaSCo: a database of evaluated yeast transcription factor sequence specificitiesGenomic regions flanking E-box binding sites influence DNA binding specificity of bHLH transcription factors through DNA shapeDry and wet approaches for genome-wide functional annotation of conventional and unconventional transcriptional activatorsDisentangling the many layers of eukaryotic transcriptional regulationComputational identification of diverse mechanisms underlying transcription factor-DNA occupancyThe zinc cluster transcription factor Ahr1p directs Mcm1p regulation of Candida albicans adhesionMuMoD: a Bayesian approach to detect multiple modes of protein-DNA binding from genome-wide ChIP dataBayesian hierarchical model of protein-binding microarray k-mer data reduces noise and identifies transcription factor subclasses and preferred k-mersMapping functional transcription factor networks from gene expression data.Improving analysis of transcription factor binding sites within ChIP-Seq data based on topological motif enrichmentLearning protein-DNA interaction landscapes by integrating experimental data through computational models.Mapping Mammalian Cell-type-specific Transcriptional Regulatory Networks Using KD-CAGE and ChIP-seq Data in the TC-YIK Cell Line.Prediction and validation of protein-protein interactors from genome-wide DNA-binding data using a knowledge-based machine-learning approachMotif Enrichment Analysis: a unified framework and an evaluation on ChIP data.A data integration approach to mapping OCT4 gene regulatory networks operative in embryonic stem cells and embryonal carcinoma cells.ChIP on Chip: surprising results are often artifacts.Robust target gene discovery through transcriptome perturbations and genome-wide enhancer predictions in Drosophila uncovers a regulatory basis for sensory specification.Predicting direct protein interactions from affinity purification mass spectrometry data.Computational study of associations between histone modification and protein-DNA binding in yeast genome by integrating diverse information.Two distinct promoter architectures centered on dynamic nucleosomes control ribosomal protein gene transcriptionCharacterizing a collective and dynamic component of chromatin immunoprecipitation enrichment profiles in yeastNucleosome repositioning links DNA (de)methylation and differential CTCF binding during stem cell development.Curated collection of yeast transcription factor DNA binding specificity data reveals novel structural and gene regulatory insights.Accurate prediction of inducible transcription factor binding intensities in vivo.Is transcription factor binding site turnover a sufficient explanation for cis-regulatory sequence divergence?Explicit DNase sequence bias modeling enables high-resolution transcription factor footprint detection.Spatial promoter recognition signatures may enhance transcription factor specificity in yeast.Binding of nucleoid-associated protein fis to DNA is regulated by DNA breathing dynamics.Pax6 interactions with chromatin and identification of its novel direct target genes in lens and forebrainFission yeast CSL proteins function as transcription factorsExperimental strategies for studying transcription factor-DNA binding specificities.Nucleosome free regions in yeast promoters result from competitive binding of transcription factors that interact with chromatin modifiers.Determination and inference of eukaryotic transcription factor sequence specificity.Loregic: a method to characterize the cooperative logic of regulatory factorsTranscriptional regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: transcription factor regulation and function, mechanisms of initiation, and roles of activators and coactivators.Extensive characterization of NF-κB binding uncovers non-canonical motifs and advances the interpretation of genetic functional traits.The orchestration of mammalian tissue morphogenesis through a series of coherent feed-forward loops.
P2860
Q21132333-DDF97447-C4C6-4E85-9C03-2C0EAC96E98DQ24614616-528202E5-ADA4-48BF-AD2C-2B36C2B5B405Q24622368-0B0CD5B9-791B-4E80-B9E7-25A9F174E04AQ24623237-87801353-9661-482B-B91C-143CE518228EQ24630737-1729F874-0720-41F0-B6F0-916F80393AC0Q26741875-F4F0D6BF-6B12-4122-917D-8EC5C952161AQ26865492-0C14B60F-E55F-4732-8209-5F6DCD328D84Q28535025-F75CF40C-1EB7-4DAE-BB5F-1DA25A7868F0Q28655846-DA03705F-128B-4F58-9D4D-D98F5B0DF2D9Q30574547-C7EBD736-2D1C-4909-877C-A319E841B3B8Q30612719-ED40FF6F-1AB5-485D-B771-2C5EF03E6C95Q30620797-0CA12F4A-1456-46A3-8270-21430BE292ADQ30830996-E24C1F68-7F5B-4D59-83C2-9D94C930A6C5Q30833821-26A24B75-662B-41FC-BD21-6D9767372EB8Q31030208-D78BBF9A-2E6B-47DA-AAD2-488E2D8C2250Q31133691-FB7FB0D4-ACA6-410A-BCAE-7CC6E62BCDD2Q33548170-0B7AFCA4-7A71-4EF1-A08E-4FA3595D3319Q33588536-B0D72957-D5DC-49B3-9763-1E3C704CF9DCQ33625340-DDEF710C-65C4-4F6E-BB73-923095F19451Q33644434-C4C68C69-5075-4D7E-B6DF-30D3851ED109Q33733622-77ADEF3E-CCB8-4573-AA75-0613BB084FFBQ33860446-37B0D5B7-4527-4964-979C-B18B26C11C95Q33984507-D203E539-FB55-4025-83A0-5FC661B5E408Q34012041-6F82868D-47AB-446C-BA04-60A1DD3E4E30Q34040886-C36975CA-4115-4EAF-9071-9FDDE5E770F1Q34107923-1E77F0C0-032F-499C-9661-0E4A0B0D1A4BQ34221053-59E712A1-0F46-4456-8F28-B57BB2794EBFQ34382839-C7CF1B9F-3166-435C-8BAA-4E2009574EE2Q34510016-06B8C2BA-1541-485D-BD85-E188A834D1B0Q34548340-AEABDE47-4D6D-4647-8EE8-9D611DE1CC1EQ34558005-34688CDB-A0F9-45C2-938F-D7C69B516B0CQ34559489-5FA0E560-2FC3-4032-93F1-AD257960E987Q34649145-C953C145-7C05-4FEE-9234-50F835B5AFD3Q34832146-EB9DDC3D-55CA-419A-A7D2-6057F009B552Q34976936-305EA366-E70A-4640-992F-1ECAA7749A14Q35249717-0AD034B7-7F9F-44E1-A17F-04781470DA95Q35465289-A4383E7A-4239-40F3-A3FE-9E7FC1171F94Q35542072-CB2FE92E-2BBE-4692-961C-B79AEC26D52DQ35557677-393A4BEA-50D3-4A9B-B266-31AC431B2618Q35604583-2325D74A-9EB0-4DAB-9720-0FA01C0D0479
P2860
Distinguishing direct versus indirect transcription factor-DNA interactions.
description
2009 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2009 թուականի Նոյեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2009 թվականի նոյեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2009年の論文
@ja
2009年論文
@yue
2009年論文
@zh-hant
2009年論文
@zh-hk
2009年論文
@zh-mo
2009年論文
@zh-tw
2009年论文
@wuu
name
Distinguishing direct versus indirect transcription factor-DNA interactions.
@ast
Distinguishing direct versus indirect transcription factor-DNA interactions.
@en
Distinguishing direct versus indirect transcription factor-DNA interactions.
@nl
type
label
Distinguishing direct versus indirect transcription factor-DNA interactions.
@ast
Distinguishing direct versus indirect transcription factor-DNA interactions.
@en
Distinguishing direct versus indirect transcription factor-DNA interactions.
@nl
prefLabel
Distinguishing direct versus indirect transcription factor-DNA interactions.
@ast
Distinguishing direct versus indirect transcription factor-DNA interactions.
@en
Distinguishing direct versus indirect transcription factor-DNA interactions.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P3181
P356
P1433
P1476
Distinguishing direct versus indirect transcription factor-DNA interactions.
@en
P2093
Alexander J Hartemink
Martha L Bulyk
Raluca Gordân
P2860
P304
P3181
P356
10.1101/GR.094144.109
P407
P577
2009-11-01T00:00:00Z