Learning a novel phonological contrast depends on interactions between individual differences and training paradigm design.
about
High or low? Comparing high and low-variability phonetic training in adult and child second language learners.The Role of Corticostriatal Systems in Speech Category LearningNon-native Speech Learning in Older Adults.Performance Pressure Enhances Speech Learning.Varying irrelevant phonetic features hinders learning of the feature being trained.Enhanced cognitive and perceptual processing: a computational basis for the musician advantage in speech learning.Intensive Foreign Language Learning Reveals Effects on Categorical Perception of Sibilant Voicing After Only 3 Weeks.Poor phonetic perceivers are affected by cognitive load when resolving talker variability.Pigeons acquire multiple categories in parallel via associative learning: a parallel to human word learning?Effect of explicit dimensional instruction on speech category learning.Auditory-cognitive training improves language performance in prelingually deafened cochlear implant recipients.Elevated depressive symptoms enhance reflexive but not reflective auditory category learning.Individual aptitude in Mandarin lexical tone perception predicts effectiveness of high-variability training.Tests of a Dual-systems Model of Speech Category LearningToward a dual-learning systems model of speech category learningDual-learning systems during speech category learning.Linking neurogenetics and individual differences in language learning: the dopamine hypothesis.Training to improve language outcomes in cochlear implant recipients.Competitive processes in cross-situational word learningDual systems of speech category learning across the lifespan.Personalized learning: From neurogenetics of behaviors to designing optimal language training.Context and repetition in word learning.Successful non-native speech perception is linked to frequency following response phase consistencyThe role of training structure in perceptual learning of accented speech.Dynamic Brains and the Changing Rules of Neuroplasticity: Implications for Learning and Recovery.Non-native phonetic learning is destabilized by exposure to phonological variability before and after training.Task-General and Acoustic-Invariant Neural Representation of Speech Categories in the Human Brain.Effectiveness of speech therapy in adults with intellectual disabilities.What Can Lexical Tone Training Studies in Adults Tell Us about Tone Processing in Children?A Comparison of Stimulus Variability in Lexical Tone and Melody Perception.Adaptation to novel foreign-accented speech and retention of benefit following training: Influence of aging and hearing loss.Computer game as a tool for training the identification of phonemic length.Training-induced brain activation and functional connectivity differentiate multi-talker and single-talker speech training.Lexical encoding of L2 tones: The role of L1 stress, pitch accent and intonationThe Effect of Speech Variability on Tonal Language Speakers' Second Language Lexical Tone Learning
P2860
Q30354873-A972CF0A-BAAC-4410-8112-6714A09A1B5AQ30359682-C8E90D4A-9F6A-45F1-9488-A46A5A2F5007Q30362705-157A6AA0-B3C8-4D0A-BDA6-2DD67711D3E5Q30365918-8484A064-5065-4AAF-8E53-2EE8BDB74EA1Q30366790-8F68D780-ECCC-4527-9373-5653F4281BD6Q30375431-6F5359DC-CE36-46B3-AF51-09D461972192Q30376062-7A5E3A6C-3C5D-49E9-B5BD-1748423E8964Q30377696-0B1871CD-C7DE-41BA-9067-416E770CBE33Q30389555-30766AF8-6C71-4CDA-9DB6-EB01B43CAF42Q30391593-C66566DE-C5CB-46BD-9CCC-87F7D2CA4732Q30401872-F2B0594B-4962-4F26-8BD7-BE858B7B945EQ30403685-342F1279-C132-4CA4-8776-FCEA560C294BQ30423271-B025837C-5D28-4143-B9D7-239C9A893188Q30429522-3658E1E0-9EB9-4500-8853-A80F0AECC700Q30432913-BDBA2E36-962F-46EA-9401-D1087CD504CEQ30440978-E669F604-FDA9-4C17-B2AC-C63C257A7654Q30441297-9E065F34-011F-486F-9BA6-861325559A46Q30454627-C25CC4B2-B89C-4CD9-9E3C-77AD27C2841CQ36983110-F7D77357-8D26-4B4B-82E7-47CCAADD9546Q37420805-8122B974-E955-4CCB-ADF1-0E747BDFD35BQ38976521-944DE4C9-D90A-4AC4-8D7F-3E453354F26AQ39436178-019D93AE-00E5-4A32-9589-D21A22C331FCQ41231993-B6511AFA-07BB-4FD8-9CBD-AC8E056042C4Q42721640-640B92DD-1BF6-4F26-A168-83F35F29BECFQ46760489-5EB93FEE-5167-4D4A-9024-E7E8F012052FQ47161344-A8294B76-3B1C-4A70-B4BA-CD4BCDC9FE02Q47608491-493B8841-3905-4895-BD7A-CFDEBB3F0CD1Q48153071-2B0F45F3-28F2-4A8D-A63D-B174D6BFD973Q49196225-2E4852FE-1868-4A65-A3D0-C5727EB11EEDQ49339260-C34FEF90-713D-488A-9B25-D8C31DFEA9B7Q50346922-1CB3396B-39D8-4EA1-93BB-19B0566496B9Q50734738-E39D4E88-C354-4C6E-820D-8392B895034DQ52657447-8BCAE8D0-95A9-4D54-9F89-3E656BB59AEFQ57975950-A6F8159F-F6D5-4103-98AD-F4C875936DCAQ58574065-864F953E-6519-42B2-9F81-E7B6217D7ABB
P2860
Learning a novel phonological contrast depends on interactions between individual differences and training paradigm design.
description
2011 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2011 թուականի Յուլիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2011 թվականի հուլիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2011年の論文
@ja
2011年論文
@yue
2011年論文
@zh-hant
2011年論文
@zh-hk
2011年論文
@zh-mo
2011年論文
@zh-tw
2011年论文
@wuu
name
Learning a novel phonological ...... and training paradigm design.
@ast
Learning a novel phonological ...... and training paradigm design.
@en
type
label
Learning a novel phonological ...... and training paradigm design.
@ast
Learning a novel phonological ...... and training paradigm design.
@en
prefLabel
Learning a novel phonological ...... and training paradigm design.
@ast
Learning a novel phonological ...... and training paradigm design.
@en
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
Learning a novel phonological ...... s and training paradigm design
@en
P2093
Jiyeon Lee
Louisa Y Y Ha
Tyler K Perrachione
P2860
P304
P356
10.1121/1.3593366
P577
2011-07-01T00:00:00Z