IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 2: observational studies in the exploration and assessment stages.
about
Regulatory approval of new medical devices: cross sectional studyWhat Evidence Underlies Clinical Practice in Paediatric Surgery? A Systematic Review Assessing Choice of Study DesignMinimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Defining the level of evidence for technology adoption in the localized prostate cancer pathwayAppraisal of evidence base for introduction of new implants in hip and knee replacement: a systematic review of five widely used device technologiesA prospective development study investigating focal irreversible electroporation in men with localised prostate cancer: Nanoknife Electroporation Ablation Trial (NEAT)Initial assessment of safety and clinical feasibility of irreversible electroporation in the focal treatment of prostate cancerIntervention randomized controlled trials involving wrist and shoulder arthroscopy: a systematic review.A time-series study of percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale: premature adoption?Dead space closure with quilting suture versus conventional closure with drainage for the prevention of seroma after mastectomy for breast cancer (QUISERMAS): protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 3: randomised controlled trials in the assessment stage and evaluations in the long term study stage.Surrogate markers of long-term outcome in primary total hip arthroplasty: A systematic reviewThe contribution of the anaesthetist to risk-adjusted mortality after cardiac surgery.Plans to accelerate innovation in health systems are less than IDEAL.Neck pain in children: a retrospective case series.Approaches to assessing the benefits and harms of medical devices for application in surgery.Translating Regenerative Biomaterials Into Clinical Practice.Systematic review and critical appraisal of the impact of acellular dermal matrix use on the outcomes of implant-based breast reconstruction.Innovation in neurosurgery: less than IDEAL? A systematic review.Personalized external aortic root support: a review of the current status.Patient-reported outcomes and their predictors at 2- and 3-year follow-up after immediate latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction and adjuvant treatment.Predicting surgical outcome in patients with glioblastoma multiforme using pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging: development and preliminary validation of a grading system.Risk-adjusted procedure tailoring leads to uniformly low complication rates in ventral and incisional hernia repair: a propensity score analysis and internal validation of classification criteria.Quilting Suture of Mastectomy Dead Space Compared with Conventional Closure with Drain.Adaptation and innovation: a grounded theory study of procedural variation in the academic surgical workplace.Personalised External Aortic Root Support (PEARS) Compared with Alternatives for People with Life-Threatening Genetically Determined Aneurysms of the Aortic Root.[Patient safety in health service research].Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy (LEOPARD-2): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Evaluation of the effects of multiple providers in complex surgical interventions.Patents running out: time to take stock of robotic surgery.Transoral robotic surgery for residual and recurrent oropharyngeal cancers: Exploratory study of surgical innovation using the IDEAL framework for early-phase surgical studies.Protocol for a Randomized Phase II Trial for Mesh Optimization by Autologous Plasma Coating in Prolapse Repair: IDEAL Stage 3.Augmenting endogenous repair of soft tissues with nanofibre scaffolds.Adoption of a novel surgical innovation into clinical practice: protocol for a qualitative systematic review examining surgeon views.Development of an open prospective observational multicentre cohort study to determine the impact of standardization of laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (IPOM) for incisional hernia on clinical outcome and quality of life (LIPOM-Trial)Robot-assisted stereotactic brain biopsy: systematic review and bibliometric analysis.Systematic review of the impact of breast-conserving surgery on cancer outcomes of multiple ipsilateral breast cancersA Multicentre Study of 5-year Outcomes Following Focal Therapy in Treating Clinically Significant Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer
P2860
Q24658647-A3282C24-6924-45D4-9C41-8BEBE6950505Q26766697-A661176F-8169-4DAC-9B36-480C93962F9CQ30844620-C1FC49E3-B3DE-4440-A987-0663CDF6C17FQ34061419-0D78F9B8-BF10-42D1-885A-3DD215194044Q34157467-F65D0E8B-C155-4947-8F5F-0731B9E7A7E8Q34306878-C9D726AF-8B9C-4ACB-A3A2-4F0922B7D82BQ34490212-577EAB7B-5A6F-4B30-A5CC-442F8006F22BQ35212769-3641F0CC-3BCB-4472-B70F-8C7D066BA8B7Q36472707-9C6416F5-A971-4277-8F05-1BE05E8C22BAQ36773255-0075B018-44B9-4264-82A6-9728767C4D19Q36937308-4A4B851F-8300-42ED-BD70-835C5A83E760Q37038038-39FBAB8D-EAAE-452C-B3EE-494DC9DE1F79Q37105521-6C856201-1590-41CB-B486-DB978D1BA0F2Q37156367-83E4ED5D-BF5A-4893-95D9-A22D8FBA59A3Q37291495-13476C35-2B7F-40E4-86CD-04812BD88A26Q38188436-F42B8BDF-9492-468E-ADD7-58E2562B3C2FQ38522439-1531186D-AAD7-4B6A-9FCA-8936036D9D64Q38537402-FCE5E91F-8AB8-416E-B465-8E422784D597Q38638540-934B668E-AFC6-4974-B59D-AB6A0E11E4B4Q38794728-85013F75-B62B-47C6-BA0C-C66CB5B4F712Q38902289-BCECDB4B-66B1-491A-9611-99487FC07132Q39138096-888AD1B8-35BD-4F7D-8B74-C3E783DB2615Q40177825-8ACC3AE4-1FF5-4E75-9D1E-ABB4C54D1068Q41418738-FFCA4762-2EE3-4CCC-9BE5-4D3DFBEC6098Q41578232-AA97DD82-6337-4CBD-A2FD-B39B23FA2AAFQ42343438-B997C4A3-02D0-426D-842A-24F34EC54447Q46009309-B669F7E7-3BA6-4F5A-9CB9-2A584E890193Q47111447-59BEFA90-F477-4815-8ABE-CAD264B571CBQ47260661-CBC3EE16-4785-48A4-B8AB-F54FE649B7E4Q48084691-6056B071-7A61-4159-AD2D-57B38E5C1FCAQ48110583-628794E5-6CED-4940-9ADC-2A60BEB58C79Q50992198-F679C61F-F3CF-47ED-9A22-D438020E895CQ52562898-DAE05A52-2AF4-4C45-9F6E-CFF565570B53Q52582230-07EE3C89-EA30-463F-A58D-7CF7735D1E46Q55285470-B118C09E-66AF-44DC-ABED-EBBF6AC1CEB4Q55296363-FC80ECC2-5EE7-4E51-9CB5-F479AB3284F4Q57179206-898E0DBF-DCD5-42F6-9723-84720B4633F3Q58794132-F94B622F-1728-4AAE-8456-C867B6A2CF61
P2860
IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 2: observational studies in the exploration and assessment stages.
description
2013 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2013年の論文
@ja
2013年論文
@yue
2013年論文
@zh-hant
2013年論文
@zh-hk
2013年論文
@zh-mo
2013年論文
@zh-tw
2013年论文
@wuu
2013年论文
@zh
2013年论文
@zh-cn
name
IDEAL framework for surgical i ...... oration and assessment stages.
@en
type
label
IDEAL framework for surgical i ...... oration and assessment stages.
@en
prefLabel
IDEAL framework for surgical i ...... oration and assessment stages.
@en
P2093
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
IDEAL framework for surgical i ...... oration and assessment stages.
@en
P2093
IDEAL Group
Jeffrey S Barkun
Patrick L Ergina
Peter McCulloch
P2860
P356
10.1136/BMJ.F3011
P407
P577
2013-06-18T00:00:00Z