How equitable are colorectal cancer screening programs which include FOBTs? A review of qualitative and quantitative studies.
about
Reducing inequities in colorectal cancer screening in North AmericaEquity of colorectal cancer screening: cross-sectional analysis of National Bowel Cancer Screening Program data for South Australia.A population-based cross-sectional study of colorectal cancer screening practices of first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients.Individual- and provider-level factors associated with colorectal cancer screening in accordance with guideline recommendation: a community-level perspective across varying levels of riskGender differences in attitudes impeding colorectal cancer screening.Uptake of colorectal cancer screening among Ontarians with intellectual and developmental disabilities.Capsule Commentary on Berkowitz et al., Building Equity Improvement into Quality Improvement: Reducing Socioeconomic Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening as Part of Population Health Management.Social inequalities in a population based colorectal cancer screening programme in the Basque Country.Longitudinal Rates of Colon Cancer Screening Use in Winnipeg, Canada: The Experience of a Universal Health-Care System with an Organized Colon Screening Program.Screening practices of Australian men and women categorized as "at or slightly above average risk" of colorectal cancer.Reducing income-related inequities in colorectal cancer screening: lessons learned from a retrospective analysis of organised programme and non-programme screening delivery in Winnipeg, Manitoba.Attitudes and beliefs of non-participants in a population-based screening programme for colorectal cancerRealist methods in medical education research: what are they and what can they contribute?Cancer beliefs in ethnic minority populations: a review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.Ethical issues with colorectal cancer screening-a systematic review.Equity in social care for people with intellectual disabilities? A cross-sectional study examining the distribution of social care funding across local authorities in England.Reasons for participation and nonparticipation in colorectal cancer screening: a randomized trial of colonoscopy and CT colonography.Impact of gender on decisions to participate in faecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening: a qualitative study.The uptake of secondary prevention by adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities.Participation and detection rates by age and sex for colonoscopy versus fecal immunochemical testing in colorectal cancer screening.To participate or not? Giving voice to gender and socio-economic differences in colorectal cancer screening programmes.Institutional (mis)trust in colorectal cancer screening: a qualitative study with Greek, Iranian, Anglo-Australian and Indigenous groups.Ambivalence and its influence on participation in screening for colorectal cancer.Comparing barriers to colorectal cancer screening with barriers to breast and cervical screening: a population-based survey of screening-age women in Great Britain.Influence of a screening navigation program on social inequalities in health beliefs about colorectal cancer screening.
P2860
Q26859952-12E9ABF3-3A8B-44E7-A7C8-E97DB5894738Q33813938-C11D0AB1-B3F8-4C13-BAD2-09FBC642CDC1Q34543706-097927DB-C379-4D03-8B15-DACA123357BEQ34628678-4248DC29-E94B-4242-B4D3-F00A9FFD9EF5Q34739360-0769CF24-B805-4806-9837-7DE4AEA951AAQ35092281-72B1C318-B901-4B4F-BDD4-EB2CBCF5A880Q35752621-4FAC72C6-39F6-4CE9-8138-CAC248D18B69Q35800004-F42FE503-12A5-4182-ADA9-937079FC4A86Q36388157-1CD9F504-166B-46A0-B50E-D0B03A185A90Q36429192-22175AB8-A8A6-40B7-A87E-20911633813BQ36625376-17A88A14-53AD-4044-9F98-68A9FAAF19FEQ37333526-69B723FE-437E-42FE-B438-95135451E8CCQ37965784-13E36B0B-667A-46B6-9293-8546B9E3E3C8Q38925199-26723DCF-3146-47C9-AC37-D3343B964539Q39057737-8561975E-6103-4471-AC88-3EF92F4D1440Q39423692-507C6A52-00B3-451A-A4C9-463DF94946E3Q39508408-96A1C127-A6DD-4948-A865-A428F1CBACE5Q40917682-D42B60EE-B5A5-40AF-A47A-AB66D5B6262AQ41661137-3F67605C-BD7D-48B7-9888-2122D8CA5744Q44189797-416F43FB-12DB-4DF6-AA81-9789D77F7FCBQ45241333-F7E31EF4-2F5A-4D9D-9629-BC00962877E2Q45787959-7DF17C04-3F4A-4FB1-8B68-19F011582D5DQ46467598-D8F46B34-D6C0-4E03-B409-80EE637D9081Q46881030-837DC1A4-B705-4A7B-BCAB-20A1F12BBCC5Q47691069-5B2164FF-D473-4256-8FAE-081BF16E1241
P2860
How equitable are colorectal cancer screening programs which include FOBTs? A review of qualitative and quantitative studies.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 11 February 2010
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
How equitable are colorectal c ...... tive and quantitative studies.
@en
How equitable are colorectal c ...... tive and quantitative studies.
@nl
type
label
How equitable are colorectal c ...... tive and quantitative studies.
@en
How equitable are colorectal c ...... tive and quantitative studies.
@nl
prefLabel
How equitable are colorectal c ...... tive and quantitative studies.
@en
How equitable are colorectal c ...... tive and quantitative studies.
@nl
P2093
P50
P1433
P1476
How equitable are colorectal c ...... ative and quantitative studies
@en
P2093
Gary Misan
Graeme Young
Michelle Ah Matt
Stephen Cole
P304
P356
10.1016/J.YPMED.2010.02.003
P407
P50
P577
2010-02-11T00:00:00Z