Program evaluation models and related theories: AMEE guide no. 67.
about
Improving the transition from medical school to internship - evaluation of a preparation for internship courseIs the delivery of a quality improvement education programme in obstetrics and gynaecology for final year medical students feasible and still effective in a shortened time frame?Curated Collections for Educators: Five Key Papers about Program EvaluationInservice trainings for Shiraz University of Medical Sciences employees: Effectiveness assessment by using the CIPP model.Undergraduate medical education programme renewal: a longitudinal context, input, process and product evaluation studyGlobal mental health: transformative capacity building in Nicaragua.Association of research self-efficacy with medical student career interests, specialization, and scholarship: a case study.Program evaluation of an Integrated Basic Science Medical Curriculum in Shiraz Medical School, Using CIPP Evaluation Model.Developing a holistic policy and intervention framework for global mental health.Evaluating an interprofessional education curriculum: A theory-informed approach.Evaluating technology-enhanced learning: A comprehensive framework.Mental health and addictions capacity building for community health centres in Ontario.The value of medical education programmes: what are the right questions?12 Tips for programmatic assessment.Volume-outcome relationships in critical care. Understanding the mechanism.Twelve tips for developing, implementing, and sustaining medical education fellowship programs: Building on new trends and solid foundations.Addressing needs of diverse stakeholders: Twelve tips for leaders of health professions education programs.How can systems engineering inform the methods of programme evaluation in health professions education?Articulating a role for program evaluation in responsible conduct of research programs.How comprehensive are research studies investigating the efficacy of technology-enhanced learning resources in anatomy education? A systematic review.Improving quality of referral letters from primary to secondary care: a literature review and discussion paper.Teaching Targeted Drug Discovery and Development to Healthcare Professionals.Has the new Kirkpatrick generation built a better hammer for our evaluation toolbox?Measuring learning gain: Comparing anatomy drawing screencasts and paper-based resources.A holistic model for evaluating the impact of individual technology-enhanced learning resources.A Website Supporting Sensitive Religious and Cultural Advance Care Planning (ACPTalk): Formative and Summative Evaluation.Comparing Kirkpatrick's original and new model with CIPP evaluation model.Educational impact of Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise: A game changer.Moving anesthesiology educational resources to the point of care: experience with a pediatric anesthesia mobile app.Involving general practice trainees in clinical practice guideline adaptation.Using Appreciative Inquiry to Inform Program Evaluation in Graduate Medical Education
P2860
Q30217337-805520C8-20C0-44CD-B2DA-7067FB9D0CE7Q30853716-75D44650-3773-4664-8215-447E687E47FDQ33752461-04D11AF9-6518-4ABD-A76B-2093A274BABBQ35489891-B4E8EAAD-9131-442A-9D92-B3CA04EFA4E0Q36581931-158D998D-46F9-41CC-8F65-8B3D2C027FE5Q37212237-FBBED5F1-0F9F-430D-A24C-D6A18E331EE8Q38231042-9E56BEE6-B608-4FE0-B8F1-B35E7DA48FFEQ38650237-D6658BF7-6064-458F-BADB-60D9E756FFCDQ39022736-2A3763E0-9D6C-4734-BA17-24F151B22DBCQ40830818-B225AC1B-B876-4C2D-B8E4-6831ED336BBEQ41202561-AB1A8CAA-19C7-4991-A30D-DC088490F511Q42375821-ED7CFDFA-392D-4A53-A59C-B016E2A3E5D8Q43879509-9719E451-846E-49E0-82B5-F3F18C75BCC6Q45400005-E1A65DAA-5761-45A6-928C-57E274CF9817Q45788528-64682FEE-FA3A-4CB1-99E2-30DDC9BC315EQ46088338-0EFB65ED-D957-4D39-84C7-D7299A570705Q46258158-978C2F9F-777B-4020-99CD-78CCB5AD52DEQ47378566-D6AA1BE2-3895-45EB-8822-D56CC8211A3DQ48161495-BC954370-BE3B-4C54-BCB1-AFD26DB8D06FQ48513879-AE5DB63B-3BDB-40D7-B7B3-BFB92DFF74CAQ48578852-E9C3210E-C690-45A4-8E21-AFA8626B00BFQ50128945-D862AB7E-E298-4BC0-AA8C-80585E933585Q50433894-693D5D00-6F98-49BA-97E8-F7B89D9F3DECQ50471848-4C4BE793-5713-4A41-94D2-81E1910F93B5Q50489869-943D48BD-7205-4045-B02A-970F0E4A7260Q52584800-7346E0C2-9C1B-403A-BC3A-A75D31EF3C95Q52614364-71E9A23F-A5F0-427F-B4C8-493F31197D80Q55176202-7535AA3B-35DA-4ACA-B20C-7363D4BE5244Q55334478-7674E735-E5BC-4D79-8ADC-6A2F4AB67134Q55430187-16724B9E-6139-4E3D-AE57-1D9CD6B86005Q58595476-99D54B10-F2CF-4AE7-A309-B9FFDE703A1E
P2860
Program evaluation models and related theories: AMEE guide no. 67.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articol științific
@ro
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@gl
artigo científico
@pt
artigo científico
@pt-br
artikel ilmiah
@id
artikull shkencor
@sq
artículo científico
@es
name
Program evaluation models and related theories: AMEE guide no. 67.
@en
type
label
Program evaluation models and related theories: AMEE guide no. 67.
@en
prefLabel
Program evaluation models and related theories: AMEE guide no. 67.
@en
P2860
P1433
P1476
Program evaluation models and related theories: AMEE guide no. 67.
@en
P2093
Ann W Frye
Paul A Hemmer
P2860
P304
P356
10.3109/0142159X.2012.668637
P577
2012-01-01T00:00:00Z