Research ethics. Research practice and participant preferences: the growing gulf.
about
Evolving approaches to the ethical management of genomic dataThe tension between data sharing and the protection of privacy in genomics researchReturn of individual research results and incidental findings: facing the challenges of translational scienceConducting a large, multi-site survey about patients' views on broad consent: challenges and solutionsGenomics really gets personal: how exome and whole genome sequencing challenge the ethical framework of human genetics researchRespecting Autonomy Over Time: Policy and Empirical Evidence on Re-Consent in Longitudinal Biomedical ResearchFair Shares and Sharing Fairly: A Survey of Public Views on Open Science, Informed Consent and Participatory Research in BiobankingLaunching PCORnet, a national patient-centered clinical research networkParticipant-Centric Initiatives: Tools to Facilitate Engagement In ResearchEthical and legal implications of whole genome and whole exome sequencing in African populations.Informed Consent in Genome-Scale Research: What Do Prospective Participants Think?Offering aggregate results to participants in genomic research: opportunities and challengesdbGaP data access requests: a call for greater transparencyEthical and practical challenges of sharing data from genome-wide association studies: the eMERGE Consortium experiencePublic Attitudes toward Consent and Data Sharing in Biobank Research: A Large Multi-site Experimental Survey in the USNCI think tank concerning the identifiability of biospecimens and "omic" data.Are all "research fields" equal? Rethinking practice for the use of data from crowdsourcing market places.Returning findings within longitudinal cohort studies: the 1958 birth cohort as an exemplar.Re-contacting participants for inclusion in the database of Genotypes and Phenotypes (dbGaP): Findings from three case-control studies of lung cancer.Stewardship practices of U.S. biobanksNeglected ethical issues in biobank management: Results from a U.S. studyResearch ethics. Paying patients for their tissue: the legacy of Henrietta LacksAttitudes of African-American parents about biobank participation and return of results for themselves and their childrenNewborn screening education on the internet: a content analysis of North American newborn screening program websites.Surrogate receptivity to participation in critical illness genetic research: aligning research oversight and stakeholder concerns.Are enrollment sites the key to optimizing participation in genetic studies?Latino beliefs about biomedical research participation: a qualitative study on the U.S.-Mexico border.Considerations in the construction of an instrument to assess attitudes regarding critical illness gene variation researchThe meaning of genetic research results: reflections from individuals with and without a known genetic disorder.A survey of patient perspectives on the research use of health information and biospecimensMapping the Ethics of Translational Genomics: Situating Return of Results and Navigating the Research-Clinical Divide.Genetics researchers' and IRB professionals' attitudes toward genetic research review: a comparative analysis.Reporting actionable research results: shared secrets can save lives.Perspectives of Decisional Surrogates and Patients Regarding Critical Illness Genetic ResearchDifferences in preferences for models of consent for biobanks between Black and White women.The post-analytical phase of histopathology practice: Storage, retention and use of human tissue specimens.Participant views on consent in cancer genetics research: preparing for the precision medicine era.Informed consent in the era of biobanksParental Views on Expanded Newborn Screening Using Whole-Genome Sequencing.Consent Issues in Genetic Research: Views of Research Participants
P2860
Q24618993-B3D9BB13-1970-4DDC-B1F0-83243B88EF5FQ26866269-C79E0D86-2DEF-4F57-91E7-8D6AF5AE0C9DQ27026989-E5078A33-B3A6-4742-B49C-3029E094DDD5Q28593352-C5A796FB-9649-43D5-93CC-D6534663BA68Q28601377-A7D53573-D3B7-4A3A-AE3D-93CFAC7E9827Q28603945-BA8166E8-7E8C-44B6-BFBA-E4EF0C39C9DAQ28647331-C2713F40-48D4-4F1F-848D-BD64473668DDQ28656423-568E76FE-0940-4A7C-945A-217078C6E851Q28658381-7D9B4271-2672-494F-B30B-517A99B09A70Q28684652-D09746FE-EFB6-4B79-8D21-AD4474FD661AQ28704258-912C1635-E678-48FF-AA6A-1775715BB435Q28709472-42E5F416-88F9-4C31-9A98-F275EDF142BCQ28728125-7F2DF5FA-E2BC-4732-BF4B-5D2D1F1C38AEQ28742978-FBBA5378-5689-4298-A1DA-770D0CDF9E53Q30490882-FE82CD06-8824-4D27-98C0-B582A1518AF3Q30615523-A45EAE58-E74B-43C7-A132-8F4D424B78AAQ31121144-15F7F222-9107-41B3-8FB4-63BBEE9C556FQ34040535-A748F397-86CD-465E-BF1C-1A0367F03E8FQ34193448-DAFA0532-0746-4C35-85A2-AFB5ED13DF15Q34288996-903CFC61-F7CC-40D8-96B7-894AAC49C2F0Q34495683-C7F15628-FFAF-429A-85B3-665295972E3CQ34633036-C3535163-C0A3-4D41-ADE6-D41E3B5FF7B2Q34663288-6602FB69-CC62-4D99-8AAE-09175F8AB6E5Q35263937-81CF91E9-94C1-463A-94D6-88EF5DA236F2Q35298698-13D18EC9-4A61-44D9-953F-C3DA9AF7C9A7Q35557635-C9A2AD97-ED56-4FE4-AFF9-F8FE42953997Q35760026-E8A0B445-280C-4345-917A-8EFF575A5533Q35814864-2EFFDF43-9987-48A3-8C05-2179E176EC35Q36066767-B49B3CDF-BEC5-4770-8B1F-DC51305392AAQ36104494-BC9639C8-3BB6-41A5-86AD-1C19923659EFQ36206284-A881BCFE-A23E-4AEB-B575-6E6A750A6C44Q36250992-29D510C0-2590-429F-8EB8-5FBA98A5798AQ36410264-CFD55563-F4B3-441F-9C8B-58B81BBDED66Q36442555-D9D7C4EF-94D0-4539-B474-7E7CD829C8F2Q36470922-9F637D42-A14B-4968-9CB3-0E7B3D4C0FE6Q36612135-B68FB7C9-38D0-444A-B9D5-B3FB4B89CFFDQ36698437-4DF8D7CB-F00A-4B7C-BAE3-E2B8979C2E55Q36998037-FAA56E0E-22EE-44D3-9116-AAA4F94380C6Q37082552-D47CD42D-5F02-4A0D-BB81-B9022D34C9DCQ37201372-316DB463-243D-4A51-821A-3CAFBAAA89E6
P2860
Research ethics. Research practice and participant preferences: the growing gulf.
description
2011 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2011 թուականի Յունուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2011 թվականի հունվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2011年の論文
@ja
2011年論文
@yue
2011年論文
@zh-hant
2011年論文
@zh-hk
2011年論文
@zh-mo
2011年論文
@zh-tw
2011年论文
@wuu
name
Research ethics. Research practice and participant preferences: the growing gulf.
@ast
Research ethics. Research practice and participant preferences: the growing gulf.
@en
Research ethics. Research practice and participant preferences: the growing gulf.
@nl
type
label
Research ethics. Research practice and participant preferences: the growing gulf.
@ast
Research ethics. Research practice and participant preferences: the growing gulf.
@en
Research ethics. Research practice and participant preferences: the growing gulf.
@nl
prefLabel
Research ethics. Research practice and participant preferences: the growing gulf.
@ast
Research ethics. Research practice and participant preferences: the growing gulf.
@en
Research ethics. Research practice and participant preferences: the growing gulf.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
Research ethics. Research practice and participant preferences: the growing gulf
@en
P2093
E B Larson
E J Ludman
G P Jarvik
S M Fullerton
P2860
P304
P356
10.1126/SCIENCE.1199000
P407
P577
2011-01-01T00:00:00Z