Method and reporting quality in health professions education research: a systematic review. - Wikidata - wikimedia - TriplyDB

Method and reporting quality in health professions education research: a systematic review.

Method and reporting quality in health professions education research: a systematic review.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q37836987

about

The Effectiveness of Blended Learning in Health Professions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Patient outcomes in simulation-based medical education: a systematic review.Technology-enhanced simulation in emergency medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis Publishing Venues for Education Scholarship: A Needs Assessment.Gestalt assessment of online educational resources may not be sufficiently reliable and consistent.Association Between Study Quality and Publication Rates of Medical Education Abstracts Presented at the Society of General Internal Medicine Annual Meeting.Expertise, Time, Money, Mentoring, and Reward: Systemic Barriers That Limit Education Researcher Productivity-Proceedings From the AAMC GEA Workshop.Complementary and alternative medicine education for medical profession: systematic review.Redefining Quality in Medical Education Research: A Consumer's View.A systematic scoping review of adherence to reporting guidelines in health care literature Reporting of health promotion research: addressing the quality gaps in iran.Systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of thiopurines on birth outcomes from female and male patients with inflammatory bowel disease.Overcoming barriers to addressing education problems with research design: a panel discussion.Got power? A systematic review of sample size adequacy in health professions education research.Quality of randomised controlled trials in medical education reported between 2012 and 2013: a systematic review protocol.Assessing the quality of studies on the diagnostic accuracy of tumor markers.Understanding and reducing work-related psychological distress in interns: a systematic review.Deconstructing quality in education research.Building capacity for education research among clinical educators in the health professions: A BEME (Best Evidence Medical Education) Systematic Review of the outcomes of interventions: BEME Guide No. 34.Geriatrics Curricula for Internal and Family Medicine Residents: Assessing Study Quality and Learning Outcomes.Which educational interventions improve healthcare professionals' resilience?Reporting quality and risk of bias in randomised trials in health professions education.Exploring Scholarship and the Emergency Medicine Educator: A Workforce Study.How do you define high-quality education research?Manifesto for family medicine educational research.The GMA Journal for Medical Education--recent achievements and future goals.Education Scholarship Fellowships: An Emerging Model for Creating Educational Leaders.How much evidence does it take? A cumulative meta-analysis of outcomes of simulation-based education.Manifeste pour la recherche sur l’éducation en médecine familiale.Conference presentation to publication: a retrospective study evaluating quality of abstracts and journal articles in medical education research.A systematic review and meta-analysis of online versus alternative methods for training licensed health care professionals to deliver clinical interventions.Randomized controlled trials of simulation-based interventions in Emergency Medicine: a methodological review.CAEP 2016 Academic Symposium: A Writer's Guide to Key Steps in Producing Quality Medical Education Scholarship.Completeness of the reporting of evidence-based practice educational interventions: a review.The Uphill Battle of Performing Education Scholarship: Barriers Educators and Education Researchers Face.Reporting guidelines for health care simulation research: extensions to the CONSORT and STROBE statements.Does the medical literature remain inadequately described despite having reporting guidelines for 21 years? - A systematic review of reviews: an update

P2860

Q26771274-DE20B8EF-D416-4A5E-AFEA-FF16B768C8A3 Q26827535-06C0B4A2-656E-481F-B920-7A7643B3A336 Q26828500-9F274444-6454-4749-9555-4D518F3EBB66 Q30489307-E5603C12-11D5-4034-86B4-1728DF863AF4 Q30491007-8A69009A-58C0-4089-B675-339B28ACFC08 Q35876614-3A5BAFBA-A59D-41BB-8929-21CE37FEC928 Q35949415-8C6C3CDE-B60E-4EA1-A445-80F3FA8349BD Q35954833-B9F651F3-6E5B-4440-A2EA-11ABECE8D46C Q35973929-887B9BC6-8ECC-4622-BACA-1256AEF43ACD Q36831373-6C03B9BF-B729-4BA6-A992-468B9C6986CF Q37658967-A3F0BEE3-B853-4D01-AF64-1668825BA776 Q37995572-FD2FA6FE-38E1-4D51-9BB0-358F5E0B1175 Q38068466-FCC6D36C-6756-4A41-ADFB-2720E0342EFB Q38211161-8B31E9E9-DDF0-45CA-ADE8-3F570BACE0A2 Q38235638-6AE7DE75-BD39-49A8-BCB7-3860B01B18D8 Q38243470-AE82A80E-3920-45DD-B37F-E5E3D32FF096 Q38420166-02ABAAAE-0207-4C23-B214-DF637AFC1D39 Q38607698-17900F3D-9AC8-476E-8C41-57E1F48E3F0F Q38648580-25058F18-62CE-4273-AFC0-0526FD9CCD86 Q38928409-8A844664-5C8B-4A61-BBE8-FF8E7F856A84 Q38940401-FBF4C77E-0282-42F3-8345-232C341CDA7A Q39095990-5B23F294-D490-4719-852E-9D9E4C6BA01B Q41282694-FC6CEB0F-6D99-4B7E-B34D-5E55F338FA70 Q43114657-4214C87C-8524-4CB3-8DAE-5E4388195984 Q43235545-FA251C4C-DB57-4995-9CD0-250C303F4BCA Q43242293-635810A0-53D1-477A-92B5-8314D3F409B6 Q44461252-F53B1072-65F0-436B-957E-F94563E39AE9 Q44675255-C32B54AB-06F8-4DA1-A307-781D28BD28A5 Q45825430-D2D0A957-05D2-4A7E-84B9-8737332353ED Q46674590-AE0353C8-E8AC-4AA3-80C0-7E391EE5784C Q47151542-907479CB-370F-4507-80FC-A36C8E3C87F0 Q47580924-99F36835-7DE1-46D3-9A04-5A7019223278 Q48138544-95322ACA-24DE-49E9-B6E2-140059F2847A Q48370280-536F50A9-88D4-4337-A262-3E57E44B2F52 Q55004305-6695528F-2F96-44DF-B000-A529538D3488 Q55330893-EE9B8AB6-C649-4EB3-A681-EAB6E1EC61DB Q57491117-13040279-CEC0-4C91-8466-7853551EC76D

P2860

Method and reporting quality in health professions education research: a systematic review.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q37836987

description

article científic

@ca

article scientifique

@fr

articolo scientifico

@it

artigo científico

@pt

bilimsel makale

@tr

scientific article published on March 2011

@en

vedecký článok

@sk

vetenskaplig artikel

@sv

videnskabelig artikel

@da

vědecký článek

@cs

name

Method and reporting quality i ...... research: a systematic review.

@en

Method and reporting quality i ...... research: a systematic review.

@nl

type

label

Method and reporting quality i ...... research: a systematic review.

@en

Method and reporting quality i ...... research: a systematic review.

@nl

prefLabel

Method and reporting quality i ...... research: a systematic review.

@en

Method and reporting quality i ...... research: a systematic review.

@nl

P1433

Q37836987-D208B6AE-B43E-4573-94A5-3C94A6ABB13C

P1476

Q37836987-61561297-F648-4413-8CE0-199BA1EA4EFC

P2093

Q37836987-48F519EA-C391-424B-8DBA-FF32884F6635

Q37836987-592E2845-FDC4-495A-B624-65C66F57E88A

Q37836987-CF724249-DA67-45B9-84A5-E848B8B0DF66

P2860

Q37836987-085460FE-3AE0-474B-A986-44773AEC89FA

Q37836987-0B60A196-C401-49C0-AFA5-BD53DA5279CE

Q37836987-1AB4E68B-3AD7-49D4-AAE6-D70D932F89C4

Q37836987-23A412BC-86D8-4B91-A8EC-D45CE32AB262

Q37836987-2743A370-3170-4644-B3B1-8F4DDF8B21AA

Q37836987-281E9017-7916-4FCE-8A84-A43EECAE2768

Q37836987-286A8690-8FA7-4166-8EC4-B14541C56692

Q37836987-2C69A277-140B-4284-A085-DB999B6FB067

Q37836987-2E419D04-B430-4795-9D5A-D6D58B461846

Q37836987-34A43D9B-37FA-407D-80CF-4B85FC123AA6

P304

Q37836987-A2B25472-86DB-4A4B-8088-63E0011280AE

P31

Q37836987-722BACF2-E90F-4C89-BD1A-8F5ADA598F77

P356

Q37836987-2F6024C4-2EDC-4060-A81D-D942427A20CA

P433

Q37836987-ADC84F21-F254-4EB0-8F31-7FFFA882DA64

P478

Q37836987-B1D31444-48EA-4DC8-BF6F-BF17F0D45A3C

P577

Q37836987-35B1C42A-F9DA-498C-9A03-324DFF200D7E

P5875

Q37836987-35AD99E9-510A-421B-9716-952345773984

P698

Q37836987-3A2E1F7C-7460-40BC-BEBA-B343461E8087

P356

J.1365-2923.2010.03890.X

P1433

Medical Education

P1476

Method and reporting quality i ...... research: a systematic review.

@en

P2093

Anthony J Levinson

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

David A Cook

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Sarah Garside

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study

Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs

The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability

Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration

The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials

Comparison of evidence of treatment effects in randomized and nonrandomized studies.

The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials.

P304

227-238

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1111/J.1365-2923.2010.03890.X

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

3

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

45

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2011-03-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

49815823

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

21299598

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string