Public perceptions of the potential hazards associated with food production and food consumption: an empirical study.
about
Mercury in commercial fish: optimizing individual choices to reduce risk.Flawed Self-Assessment: Implications for Health, Education, and the WorkplacePerceived Control and the Optimistic Bias: A Meta-Analytic ReviewAn existential approach to risk perception.Fishing, fish consumption, and awareness about warnings in a university community in central New Jersey in 2007, and comparisons with 2004.The risks of eating and drinking.Assessing parents' perception of children's risk for recreational water illnessesA study of the perception of health risks among college students in ChinaGood nutritional practice from producer to consumer.Determinants of public attitudes to genetically modified salmon.World Market Development and Consumer Acceptance of Irradiation Technology.Attitudes of Agricultural Experts Toward Genetically Modified Crops: A Case Study in Southwest Iran.Investigating heterogeneity in the characterization of risks using best worst scaling.Outrage Factors in Government Press Releases of Food Risk and Their Influence on News Media Coverage.Unrealistic optimism about diet-related risks: implications for interventions.Impact of macronutrient-substituted foods on food choice and dietary intake.Determinants of stakeholders' attitudes towards biodiesel.European public perceptions of food risk: cross-national and methodological comparisons.Risk ranking: investigating expert and public differences in evaluating food safety hazards.Multiple attribute decision making model and application to food safety risk evaluation.Effect of deep-frying fish on risk from mercury.The role of psychological determinants and demographic factors in consumer demand for farm-to-fork traceability systems.Understanding consumer confidence in the safety of food: its two-dimensional structure and determinants.Risk perceptions of public health and food safety hazards in poultry husbandry by citizens, poultry farmers and poultry veterinarians.Public concerns in the United Kingdom about general and specific applications of genetic engineering: risk, benefit, and ethics.The media and genetically modified foods: evidence in support of social amplification of risk.Testing and validation of a hierarchical values-attitudes model in the context of green food in ChinaManaging Food Chain Risks: Integrating Technical and Stakeholder Perspectives on UncertaintyThe importance of food issues in society: Results from a national survey in AustraliaHow Natural Is “More Natural”? The Role of Method, Type of Transfer, and Familiarity for Public Perceptions of Cisgenic and Transgenic ModificationA framework for responsive health policy and corporate communicationPerception of technological risk: insights from research and lessons for risk communication and managementRisk Communication – Consumers Between Information and Irritation1Don't wash my meat: public perceptions of decontamination in meat production
P2860
Q24811512-4CE22943-912C-49F6-BA42-02C103F4404EQ28264865-8F53E323-25F0-4DBF-80D9-FCC2C9413544Q29306205-9B7EC736-C01F-46DB-A9A3-FEB81F8FE596Q30693267-6F2CB66C-99F5-4811-BEAF-BAD4A451CCD2Q33631529-C96D8C80-BC4B-47C1-AB78-02B46995037BQ34166433-79607039-0B5B-43B4-8441-97FA0FBE9E73Q35873119-DFBF00AA-567D-49F1-9995-D49F9A6C1D29Q37030736-709102D6-D3F5-4A7D-BAFC-2F7E1BD967B6Q37084704-06EEF6C8-2873-48CC-B565-F1D3DEAA64A0Q37529247-95730AAC-7E8B-4817-9EDD-198B95232F90Q37636122-CE5B13A1-AB60-422E-BC10-4FFCF3743658Q38516830-5C4B1CC3-9979-4210-8869-AC69F7E0826DQ40087104-6002389A-2C40-41B5-89EA-AFA88A313527Q40845216-ABD1CB6B-E893-4D3D-9449-A6D6F40D071CQ40994770-709B1EA8-78BA-4F85-A761-19C89134C5FAQ41501134-C1B3D1A0-34E2-4186-94F8-14ACA06BE009Q41711613-FD1BF743-7B08-4FA8-A248-C65D87219A9BQ42652247-B2D845E7-80CC-4309-8B86-0AEEB1B2D1A6Q42822617-E0A13E2F-9495-4E53-A4AA-A69B4C67FDADQ47129746-0FCC1BBA-F723-43F9-9DCE-1AC504C3809EQ47914341-2BC383B8-BE08-4A7A-ADBC-DF4B67E39C43Q50670481-03BF2E66-12F9-491B-9C97-6E8D69148827Q50894078-111AAA0E-8DEC-4079-846D-BB547F911492Q52775685-9A6BED45-FE5E-469E-93DC-D77B892E7BF2Q53606168-5125C41C-D4FF-40FE-9A03-1EBE75AA9797Q53665475-909F9BE5-CB58-4C98-B5CC-7F1BC39225CAQ56912804-B45DE96A-D5BA-4CE1-BCCA-5DCE44867D04Q57256738-462150A3-A2D5-40EC-B007-2640E5F9740AQ57395756-9D4ED1F4-24B0-447D-9DD5-D289063966BEQ57422158-32D19A40-2F7A-4E2D-8F3C-6D9159A6D76AQ57712225-398A86CC-E467-457C-BEA2-B23330324874Q58311909-2C548A53-A589-4F35-8B84-5C3D06869BCFQ58311970-3A48776A-36AC-44EF-8D04-5F7637A27914Q58517011-C61A01AB-D114-4431-8BE8-7B525011C7DD
P2860
Public perceptions of the potential hazards associated with food production and food consumption: an empirical study.
description
1994 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1994年の論文
@ja
1994年学术文章
@wuu
1994年学术文章
@zh
1994年学术文章
@zh-cn
1994年学术文章
@zh-hans
1994年学术文章
@zh-my
1994年学术文章
@zh-sg
1994年學術文章
@yue
1994年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Public perceptions of the pote ...... nsumption: an empirical study.
@en
Public perceptions of the pote ...... nsumption: an empirical study.
@nl
type
label
Public perceptions of the pote ...... nsumption: an empirical study.
@en
Public perceptions of the pote ...... nsumption: an empirical study.
@nl
prefLabel
Public perceptions of the pote ...... nsumption: an empirical study.
@en
Public perceptions of the pote ...... nsumption: an empirical study.
@nl
P2860
P1433
P1476
Public perceptions of the pote ...... nsumption: an empirical study.
@en
P2093
Shepherd R
P2860
P304
P356
10.1111/J.1539-6924.1994.TB00291.X
P50
P577
1994-10-01T00:00:00Z