Criteria for good assessment: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference.
about
Asthma education for school staffAssessing patient care: summary of the breakout group on assessment of observable learner performanceAsthma education for school staffShould essays and other "open-ended"-type questions retain a place in written summative assessment in clinical medicine?What steps are necessary to create written or web-based selected-response assessments?Review article: teaching, learning, and the pursuit of excellence in anesthesia education.Recommendations of the German Society for Medical Education and the German Association of Medical Faculties regarding university-specific assessments during the study of human, dental and veterinary medicine.Meeting international standards: a cultural approach in implementing the mini-CEX effectively in Indonesian clerkships.Designing faculty development to support the evaluation of resident competency in the intrinsic CanMEDS roles: practical outcomes of an assessment of program director needsThe ABCs of DKA: Development and Validation of a Computer-Based Simulator and Scoring SystemA first report of East Asian students' perception of progress testing: a focus group studySummative clinical competency assessment: A survey of ultrasound practitioners' viewsPortfolios in Saudi medical colleges. Why and how?Assessment formats in dental medicine: An overviewEnhancing Feedback On Case Reports To Third Year Medical Students On Clinical Attachment.Becoming an expert: a review of adult learning theory and implications for vocational training in ophthalmology.Review article: assessment in anesthesiology education.How to construct and implement script concordance tests: insights from a systematic review.Assessing diagnostic reasoning: a consensus statement summarizing theory, practice, and future needs.Is the OSCE a feasible tool to assess competencies in undergraduate medical education?Realizing the promise and importance of performance-based assessment.Developing clinical reasoning in the classroom - analysis of the 4C/ID-model.Key-feature questions for assessment of clinical reasoning: a literature review.Using patients' charts to assess medical trainees in the workplace: a systematic review.Towards a program of assessment for health professionals: from training into practice.Designing Assessment Programmes for the Model Curriculum for Emergency Medicine Specialists.On the Assessment of Paramedic Competence: A Narrative Review with Practice Implications.Trends in national licensing examinations in medicine.Core principles of assessment in competency-based medical education.Competency-based medical education and continuing professional development: A conceptualization for change.Exploring a New Simulation Approach to Improve Clinical Reasoning Teaching and Assessment: Randomized Trial Protocol.Health advocacy.Assessing interprofessional competence using a prospective reflective portfolio.Barriers to the uptake and use of feedback in the context of summative assessment.The impact of programmatic assessment on student learning: theory versus practice.Can the results of the OSCE predict the results of clinical assessment in dental education?Promoting high-quality feedback: Tool for reviewing feedback given to learners by teachers.The uneasy alliance of assessment and feedback.[Promouvoir une rétroaction de grande qualité: Outil d'examen de la rétroaction donnée aux apprenants par les enseignants].An algorithm for calculating exam quality as a basis for performance-based allocation of funds at medical schools.
P2860
Q26471660-9BD9F270-AB2B-46F8-AB5E-6DFF34A46A5AQ26825751-A110C78E-A879-4F1B-8164-DA0CA0BCAB08Q29994604-23C3F51B-527F-478A-A41A-0697EAA2B12BQ30611208-E685ACB1-01B2-4864-95AC-D7559EA79FF2Q30619069-5683EC17-928E-4F90-818D-2A6FD607372DQ34089141-D201AAC1-E8C5-4B1F-83F7-503FB146841BQ34125641-1DE12C81-77FC-47AC-8D22-574238CE65E7Q35236768-980C088F-B96C-4A4B-A9BE-D36143275574Q35653065-00B1966A-0DFC-4D99-AA03-1E8575057FCDQ35963641-99A7D819-057E-4D12-BED5-E7E7326E58F3Q36141587-9A0F8764-F9EA-4536-957B-453364CED417Q36598251-DD5EC673-5B81-4D5B-86B3-C6DA65A95C98Q36709446-92542D29-5F77-44CA-9A55-1621D381F08AQ37213401-9CFC771C-B70B-4CA8-83C6-D670F330506BQ37663279-DB243C3E-AA26-4E88-881B-E2D057CB4AF5Q37946446-E64F780B-3991-496A-9C8D-2A36B5607B59Q37964619-84F5751F-8ABB-4966-84FF-191201012927Q38012855-07BCF9B1-53BF-4E2E-AC22-626778B9E3B3Q38070855-0A79D50B-2FE1-4663-AB29-9466F72BE6DAQ38092184-B8E7B779-9C26-4629-85B2-84ED2BF71600Q38163619-89107DAA-9761-46B4-B3C9-C74B0FB82ADFQ38210294-6DFEBFCC-DE3C-4876-9C95-76EC64898020Q38238986-347404FB-E7EA-437B-A8DD-16B44802DD6FQ38343247-719C3C75-E5F5-4153-8A52-ECE4D3B9EB1DQ38385041-BAFDAFFD-F7E8-49A6-8751-AF870EC0D725Q38516612-52C65BF9-D255-4CC3-A362-020717368C9DQ38653102-70633652-DFFD-40E3-B32D-DFBFAF04B163Q38676586-B22C9FD4-F9D0-4DEF-A5C2-1A79DF127835Q38734172-4F6FA81E-9F73-4D36-BEF9-A1957CC17AEDQ38734176-1FB27E05-C765-4E00-B47B-CC137948718DQ38742080-4F5AA2CE-BDBC-440F-95ED-4CAF02282FE2Q38793155-D44D41A3-636B-453B-A330-83A3B8B3FBDCQ39094526-C69D6002-B745-4553-8F03-F322D50B9C1FQ39179329-3AFBD66E-2C6C-418E-9C11-B082BB486474Q40998677-3D814C32-F0F8-4312-910F-3EEF29DDF573Q41620861-FB72158B-272D-42F2-B566-9FE226B9F1D3Q42055634-B31A308E-0D84-4B7A-9E88-B654A419443EQ42391500-32B5B03C-7ECC-43DE-87DE-E96B0BD23BBFQ42409899-D06B2E9C-DEEA-4587-9576-28789E21CB35Q42740257-1D168BE0-64E7-4B6C-88B7-08464E7DAC80
P2860
Criteria for good assessment: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on January 2011
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Criteria for good assessment: ...... om the Ottawa 2010 Conference.
@en
Criteria for good assessment: ...... om the Ottawa 2010 Conference.
@nl
type
label
Criteria for good assessment: ...... om the Ottawa 2010 Conference.
@en
Criteria for good assessment: ...... om the Ottawa 2010 Conference.
@nl
prefLabel
Criteria for good assessment: ...... om the Ottawa 2010 Conference.
@en
Criteria for good assessment: ...... om the Ottawa 2010 Conference.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P50
P1433
P1476
Criteria for good assessment: ...... rom the Ottawa 2010 Conference
@en
P2093
Athol Kent
Brownell Anderson
John Norcini
Richard Hays
Robert Galbraith
Trudie Roberts
Vanessa Burch
Vanessa Perrott
P2860
P304
P356
10.3109/0142159X.2011.551559
P577
2011-01-01T00:00:00Z