Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases.
about
Operative Management of Lumbar Degenerative Disc DiseaseOblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLLIF): Technical Notes and Early Results of a Single Surgeon Comparative StudyClinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Does MIS Surgery Allow for Shorter Constructs in the Surgical Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity?Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis and degenerative spondylosis: 5-year results.Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Rigid Interspinous Process Fixation: A Learning Curve Analysis of a Surgeon Team's First 74 Cases.Percutaneous instrumentation of the cervical and cervico-thoracic spine using pedicle screws: preliminary clinical results and analysis of accuracyValidation and analysis of a multi-site MIS Prospective Registry through sub-analysis of an MIS TLIF SubgroupPerioperative surgical complications and learning curve associated with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a single-institute experience.Perioperative morbidity and complications in minimal access surgery techniques in obese patients with degenerative lumbar disease.Open and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of intermediate results and complicationsSingle incision percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.CT and MRI Determination of Intermuscular Space within Lumbar Paraspinal Muscles at Different Intervertebral Disc Levels.Spinous process-splitting open pedicle screw fusion provides favorable results in patients with low back discomfort and pain compared to conventional open pedicle screw fixation over 1 year after surgeryIsolated sacral injuries: Postoperative length of stay, complications, and readmission.Clinical and Radiological Results of Microsurgical Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Decompression without Posterior Instrumentation for Lateral Recess Stenosis.Percutaneous Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (pTLIF) with a Posterolateral Approach for the Treatment of Denegerative Disk Disease: Feasibility and Preliminary Results.Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a perspective on current evidence and clinical knowledge.Minimally invasive spinal arthrodesis in osteoporotic population using a cannulated and fenestrated augmented screw: technical description and clinical experience.Minimally invasive transforaminal lumber interbody fusion and degenerative lumbar spine disease.Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusionPerioperative outcomes in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery: A systematic review.Microendoscopy-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: short-term and medium-term outcomes.Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis based on the current evidenceMinimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5-S1 through a Unilateral Approach: Technical Feasibility and Outcomes.Comparison between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Conventional Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Updated Meta-analysis.Clinical outcomes of minimally invasive versus open approach for one-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the 3- to 4-year follow-up.Minimally Invasive TLIF Using Unilateral Approach and Single Cage at Single Level in Patients over 65.Comparison of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in two-level degenerative lumbar diseaseThe lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar and thoracic spine: A review.Multilevel mini-open TLIFs and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation: description of a simple technical nuance used to increase intraoperative safety and improve workflow. Tips and tricks and review of the literature.Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.Comparison of MIS vs. open PLIF/TLIF with regard to clinical improvement, fusion rate, and incidence of major complication: a meta-analysis.Economic Performance of Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLLIF) with a Focus on Hospital Throughput EfficiencyMinimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar fusion: a systematic review of complications.Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a technical description and review of the literature.Postoperative dysesthesia in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a report of five cases.Comparing miniopen and minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion in single-level lumbar degenerationMinimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: Results of 23 consecutive cases.Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Clinical and Radiological Results of Mean 46-Month Follow-Up.
P2860
Q26738917-AA7AC43A-41A9-4DF7-B6E3-4DB0D7326034Q28972219-2DF5AF67-3DCB-4AFC-A4A3-EC5D12DA7EAFQ30239932-F7CFF0A0-02DB-4F73-81DA-D3207568324AQ30252756-9603E8C3-56CD-41DB-A7D1-4AD672873E68Q33592141-B82AE148-F581-45C2-9C87-2A7B241E9D79Q33860538-C6CE08FF-C8D6-4BF0-81D5-3C453859C19FQ34996284-9A87FD09-D8F4-473A-B6F5-3ADF8054C845Q35076093-1E4073B4-A1BB-4589-B797-03D3B115D9E1Q35086632-C74C2363-7B88-4018-B429-85548C9685E5Q35223198-F3E6AD85-AE5B-4DD5-970F-E6AC67D0D752Q35502878-ED5BD68B-B44C-443C-939F-FA82375868E6Q35608303-F55544AD-C73A-42F1-89B4-89EDC337B4B2Q35803517-13FB5730-2CC8-4674-9783-FAA4FDC1D442Q35888306-29EFA126-0A0B-458C-83E1-9A068957DA24Q36069440-F77D251F-DE08-4B91-9DA8-29C33BFF5831Q36114449-AD1F4383-20CB-427B-A92B-4C749D361ECAQ36154398-2E7EE1C7-B84F-429F-860F-E260829CBEB6Q36167447-AB6EF169-A470-4A9D-AB22-DD31C93DCE73Q36219658-AE4D65C7-B3E2-46E5-B859-F274A2DF2950Q36347078-A635042B-B8B6-4E68-9EEF-5C00F212689FQ36347117-35323F2C-A344-4969-9246-687041FD8FF5Q36391404-2D270ACF-0A16-4469-8BBC-695F7EC7EB06Q36493082-3F50AE1E-7C2B-45A7-8FAB-3F235A209745Q37064395-6E449666-7AA2-4EEF-98F9-778BBA2B3E8CQ37084242-CBEBB901-73BD-4DE7-8B55-CE12B7E7FAFDQ37185461-8E53AD4A-CEF4-4AAB-97FD-B0A8E409B4B0Q37350528-BA8DC82F-8B42-4CF4-96B9-982D27BA2CAFQ37581045-F912E284-2FDE-4DE7-8F54-A303D8078207Q37676702-1C05E019-56C2-4F6C-9D5B-ABB21E9C46A8Q38035861-6B4B0225-4538-4FA8-9D2F-E7602EEAB68CQ38267708-501E61C2-90DE-4549-AF2B-C2CECDF279FEQ38392329-84C5B3DA-4A1B-4F43-BA6B-440E66CCF167Q38395169-DEA29D59-C26C-40B9-A6B4-F2A0E8EEC010Q38562327-C2054B70-E025-4507-9B1E-FCBF9112D51BQ38778756-32C4AB5C-F4D7-4B99-A281-A2428D69A918Q39119037-40316705-4A77-47CF-9BA3-B214137962F8Q39177020-2F1B4F75-1FB8-4165-818C-964327A87B07Q41769728-B6EA48A3-A947-4A9E-9E8E-501B00ED3C1CQ41867060-3B3DC414-26D2-45C8-BEEF-C116B26A2F95Q42316457-F245EDD6-A2C7-4B29-89C3-69D18F623C36
P2860
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases.
description
2010 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2010年の論文
@ja
2010年論文
@yue
2010年論文
@zh-hant
2010年論文
@zh-hk
2010年論文
@zh-mo
2010年論文
@zh-tw
2010年论文
@wuu
2010年论文
@zh
2010年论文
@zh-cn
name
Minimally invasive transforami ...... degenerative lumbar diseases.
@en
Minimally invasive transforami ...... degenerative lumbar diseases.
@nl
type
label
Minimally invasive transforami ...... degenerative lumbar diseases.
@en
Minimally invasive transforami ...... degenerative lumbar diseases.
@nl
prefLabel
Minimally invasive transforami ...... degenerative lumbar diseases.
@en
Minimally invasive transforami ...... degenerative lumbar diseases.
@nl
P2093
P1433
P1476
Minimally invasive transforami ...... degenerative lumbar diseases.
@en
P2093
Fan Shunwu
Fang Xiangqian
Zhao Fengdong
P304
P356
10.1097/BRS.0B013E3181C70FE3
P407
P577
2010-08-01T00:00:00Z