Are two methods better than one? Evaluating the effectiveness of combining errorless learning with vanishing cues.

Are two methods better than one? Evaluating the effectiveness of combining errorless learning with vanishing cues.

Item
http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q50693905
Errorless learning of prospective memory tasks: An experimental investigation in people with memory disorders.Non-pharmacological intervention for memory decline.Errorless learning in cognitive rehabilitation: a critical reviewA direct comparison of errorless and errorful therapy for object name relearning in Alzheimer's disease.Quest for the best: effects of errorless and active encoding on word re-learning in semantic dementia.The potential of virtual reality-based training to enhance the functional autonomy of Alzheimer's disease patients in cooking activities: A single case study.Elaborative encoding through self-generation enhances outcomes with errorless learning: Findings from the Skypekids memory study.Errorless learning improves memory performance in children with acquired brain injury: a controlled comparison of standard and self-generation techniques.A comparison of automatic and intentional instructions when using the method of vanishing cues in acquired brain injury.Remediation of a naming deficit following left temporal lobe epilepsy surgery.Comparing the effects of clinician and caregiver-administered lexical retrieval training for progressive anomia.The influence of evaluative right/wrong feedback on phonological and semantic processes in word learning
P2860

Are two methods better than one? Evaluating the effectiveness of combining errorless learning with vanishing cues.

Item
http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q50693905
description
2010 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2010年の論文
@ja
2010年学术文章
@wuu
2010年学术文章
@zh
2010年学术文章
@zh-cn
2010年学术文章
@zh-hans
2010年学术文章
@zh-my
2010年学术文章
@zh-sg
2010年學術文章
@yue
2010年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Are two methods better than on ...... learning with vanishing cues.
@en
Are two methods better than on ...... learning with vanishing cues.
@nl
type
label
Are two methods better than on ...... learning with vanishing cues.
@en
Are two methods better than on ...... learning with vanishing cues.
@nl
prefLabel
Are two methods better than on ...... learning with vanishing cues.
@en
Are two methods better than on ...... learning with vanishing cues.
@nl
P1433
P1476
P2093
P2860
P304
P31
P356
P433
P478
P50
P577
P5875
P698
P356
P1433
P1476
Are two methods better than on ...... s learning with vanishing cues
@en
P2093
P2860
P304
P31
P356
P433
P478
P50
P577
P5875
P698