Limiting the persistence of a chromosome break diminishes its mutagenic potential.
about
PIAS3 promotes homology‑directed repair and distal non‑homologous end joiningDNA double-strand break repair pathway choice and cancerRepair of strand breaks by homologous recombinationTargeted gene disruption to cure HIVMitotic homologous recombination maintains genomic stability and suppresses tumorigenesisATM limits incorrect end utilization during non-homologous end joining of multiple chromosome breaksRepair at single targeted DNA double-strand breaks in pluripotent and differentiated human cellsCoupling endonucleases with DNA end-processing enzymes to drive gene disruption.An RNF168 fragment defective for focal accumulation at DNA damage is proficient for inhibition of homologous recombination in BRCA1 deficient cells.High frequency targeted mutagenesis using engineered endonucleases and DNA-end processing enzymes.TGFβ induces "BRCAness" and sensitivity to PARP inhibition in breast cancer by regulating DNA-repair genesThe role of ATM in the deficiency in nonhomologous end-joining near telomeres in a human cancer cell line.Defining a genotoxic profile with mouse embryonic stem cellsTrex2 enables spontaneous sister chromatid exchanges without facilitating DNA double-strand break repair.DNA damage response factors from diverse pathways, including DNA crosslink repair, mediate alternative end joining.Correct end use during end joining of multiple chromosomal double strand breaks is influenced by repair protein RAD50, DNA-dependent protein kinase DNA-PKcs, and transcription context.Heavy Metal Exposure Influences Double Strand Break DNA Repair Outcomes.EXO1 is critical for embryogenesis and the DNA damage response in mice with a hypomorphic Nbs1 allele.Tracking genome engineering outcome at individual DNA breakpointsMultifaceted role of TREX2 in the skin defense against UV-induced skin carcinogenesis.RING finger nuclear factor RNF168 is important for defects in homologous recombination caused by loss of the breast cancer susceptibility factor BRCA1BRCA1-Ku80 protein interaction enhances end-joining fidelity of chromosomal double-strand breaks in the G1 phase of the cell cycleHeterozygous PALB2 c.1592delT mutation channels DNA double-strand break repair into error-prone pathways in breast cancer patients.Contribution of canonical nonhomologous end joining to chromosomal rearrangements is enhanced by ATM kinase deficiency.In vitro Inactivation of Latent HSV by Targeted Mutagenesis Using an HSV-specific Homing EndonucleaseCollaboration and competition between DNA double-strand break repair pathways.Redesign of extensive protein-DNA interfaces of meganucleases using iterative cycles of in vitro compartmentalization.Chromosomal Rearrangements in Cancer: Detection and potential causal mechanisms.Salient Features of Endonuclease Platforms for Therapeutic Genome EditingMAD2L2 controls DNA repair at telomeres and DNA breaks by inhibiting 5' end resectionRegulation of Single-Strand Annealing and its Role in Genome Maintenance.BRCA1 requirement for the fidelity of plasmid DNA double-strand break repair in cultured breast epithelial cells.Live imaging of induced and controlled DNA double-strand break formation reveals extremely low repair by homologous recombination in human cells.MRE11 stability is regulated by CK2-dependent interaction with R2TP complex.Double deficiency of Trex2 and DNase1L2 nucleases leads to accumulation of DNA in lingual cornifying keratinocytes without activating inflammatory responses.Concerted activities of distinct H4K20 methyltransferases at DNA double-strand breaks regulate 53BP1 nucleation and NHEJ-directed repair.Increased single-strand annealing rather than non-homologous end-joining predicts hereditary ovarian carcinoma.C-NHEJ without indels is robust and requires synergistic function of distinct XLF domains.Introduction of Large Sequence Inserts by CRISPR-Cas9 To Create Pathogenicity Mutants in the Multinucleate Filamentous Pathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum.Repeat-mediated deletions can be induced by a chromosomal break far from a repeat, but multiple pathways suppress such rearrangements
P2860
Q24609002-04F10CDB-BE8E-4A47-90B4-ED0BD720A90EQ26996175-BCA3F04C-4B29-4158-B1C1-0EA985215C85Q27012688-04B6EC87-6E3A-440D-BA41-91148863A5DDQ27023171-E704B3BE-794D-477E-A3DA-09F27BD1CB4CQ28274000-15C5C402-0589-4C9F-886E-9105D09BBCB9Q28476006-13799DE9-61F8-4455-8DFB-E60F86B356D7Q28478289-6B393F7B-7795-4931-AB99-39504BE64235Q30537830-8D947F08-FDD1-4387-BBD3-CEF5DEABCE18Q33843055-3983F5C8-B2EC-4CDA-ACF4-45A1DD68A4FDQ34325057-A6BCC175-D5A3-4293-90C5-405E3CEE401BQ34518332-9F04C4DC-8AB1-4973-BC36-511387B6365BQ34649915-CAA7DD1E-0970-44CA-BBBB-0026968228FDQ34677449-23ED4E84-F3E8-4CC1-95DA-E2252EDBF327Q35221456-F3B424B8-B3D6-45F0-84B3-71CC97A66D1CQ35550622-60CE113B-8CC7-473E-B71D-2236E3F4A80BQ35604928-61AA4FC1-BB3F-4B43-A9E7-0BD2E59D107AQ35953687-C15F2626-F7E2-4167-BB93-B994B6208385Q36002464-615246B2-917E-41F0-BC44-5DE93E23673CQ36152352-4F7D598E-755D-4739-85D1-8415E3B966B5Q36355967-E53A4599-9AFA-49D8-9141-4C1859B49295Q36418906-7C1F67AA-E890-4A46-8AD6-C01B55693B7CQ36724941-1E01259D-8C15-4533-A022-760FC936A21CQ37128441-95B0F2AE-CEC8-4938-8CBC-18EE77DF729EQ37612501-875722DE-3FE4-4F43-8CA0-E92B30B10442Q37634060-52FC5659-7D1C-4D7C-B43E-3A85093140A3Q37638191-9F199565-2C73-4BD5-8085-992EC67AA9C0Q37659896-929DC978-5D71-44B9-9F80-343F5D729105Q38552583-0831C1E4-6AEA-4401-BB3B-7AE4DD00DE07Q38706622-687D3F80-7062-4B8D-A742-5A35C91579FEQ38896234-7056F40E-4997-4515-A78D-14F1F218F208Q38906341-B9CED453-45BF-4519-9268-F198B0868E05Q39428529-27D0425A-D508-4A7B-8F52-71B4615B964CQ39439217-F1092448-5057-4415-9358-C4C514748FE1Q41151587-E066266C-0C9E-469D-B0C8-8D132F781200Q41717505-E6725B6F-9F97-443D-BCBA-A98616EEE9E6Q42793535-791B825E-736D-44F8-912A-782E4389FA54Q47138752-36D66CD2-944C-4908-B852-19214CF48EEAQ55349308-982B6A52-4192-46D6-B820-1098B05720BAQ55367646-0C35C1F3-2A9F-44D5-83B5-694710BF5BD7Q57753966-C497821B-DCDC-4EA7-8D68-254E6CBABFD5
P2860
Limiting the persistence of a chromosome break diminishes its mutagenic potential.
description
2009 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2009 թուականի Հոկտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2009 թվականի հոտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2009年の論文
@ja
2009年論文
@yue
2009年論文
@zh-hant
2009年論文
@zh-hk
2009年論文
@zh-mo
2009年論文
@zh-tw
2009年论文
@wuu
name
Limiting the persistence of a chromosome break diminishes its mutagenic potential.
@ast
Limiting the persistence of a chromosome break diminishes its mutagenic potential.
@en
Limiting the persistence of a chromosome break diminishes its mutagenic potential.
@nl
type
label
Limiting the persistence of a chromosome break diminishes its mutagenic potential.
@ast
Limiting the persistence of a chromosome break diminishes its mutagenic potential.
@en
Limiting the persistence of a chromosome break diminishes its mutagenic potential.
@nl
prefLabel
Limiting the persistence of a chromosome break diminishes its mutagenic potential.
@ast
Limiting the persistence of a chromosome break diminishes its mutagenic potential.
@en
Limiting the persistence of a chromosome break diminishes its mutagenic potential.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
Limiting the persistence of a chromosome break diminishes its mutagenic potential.
@en
P2093
Amanda Gunn
Anita Cheng
Jeremy M Stark
Nicole Bennardo
Paul Hasty
P2860
P304
P356
10.1371/JOURNAL.PGEN.1000683
P577
2009-10-16T00:00:00Z