Reliability and validity of admissions tools used to select students for the health professions.
about
Imperfect physician assistant and physical therapist admissions processes in the United States.Current medical student interviewers add data to the evaluation of medical school applicants.Predictive value of the school-leaving grade and prognosis of different admission groups for academic performance and continuity in the medical course - a longitudinal studyComparison of communication skills between medical students admitted after interviews or on academic meritsComparison of aboriginal and nonaboriginal applicants for admissions on the Multiple Mini-Interview using aboriginal and nonaboriginal interviewers.Admissions processes for five year medical courses at English schools: reviewMultiple mini-interviews predict clerkship and licensing examination performance.Dutch postgraduate GP selection procedure; reliability of interview assessments.New non-cognitive procedures for medical applicant selection: a qualitative analysis in one school.An integrative review and evidence-based conceptual model of the essential components of pre-service educationPredictive validity of a new integrated selection process for medical school admissionMultiple mini-interviews as a predictor of academic achievements during the first 2 years of medical schoolGoal orientations of health profession students throughout the undergraduate program: a multilevel study.The influence of MCAT and GPA preadmission academic metrics on interview scores.Non-cognitive selected students do not outperform lottery-admitted students in the pre-clinical stage of medical school.Academic Performance of Students with the Highest and Mediocre School-leaving Grades: Does the Aptitude Test for Medical Studies (TMS) Balance Their Prognoses?The undergraduate premedical experience in the United States: a critical review.Generalizability of a composite student selection procedure at a university-based chiropractic program.The Hamburg selection procedure for dental students - introduction of the HAM-Nat as subject-specific test for study aptitude.Assessment for selection for the health care professions and specialty training: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference.How self-determination theory can assist our understanding of the teaching and learning processes in medical education. AMEE guide No. 59.Does performance in selection processes predict performance as a dental student?A perspective on medical school admission research and practice over the last 25 years."A chance to show yourself" - how do applicants approach medical school admission essays?Are the results of questionnaires measuring non-cognitive characteristics during the selection procedure for medical school application biased by social desirability?Evidence regarding the utility of multiple mini-interview (MMI) for selection to undergraduate health programs: A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 37.Does a selection interview predict year 1 performance in dental school?A new admission method may select applicants with a distinct personality profile.Participation and selection effects of a voluntary selection process.Impact of vocational interests, previous academic experience, gender and age on Situational Judgement Test performance.CASPer, an online pre-interview screen for personal/professional characteristics: prediction of national licensure scores.Academic and non-academic selection criteria in predicting medical school performance.Application essays and future performance in medical school: are they related?How to select the doctors of the future.Comparison of UMAT scores and GPA in prediction of performance in medical school: a national study.How well do selection tools predict performance later in a medical programme?The multiple mini-interviews as a predictor of peer evaluations during clinical training in medical school.The structured interview and interviewer training in the admissions process.Computerized test versus personal interview as admission methods for graduate nursing studies: A retrospective cohort study.Candidates' and interviewers' perceptions of multiple-mini interviews for admission to an occupational therapy professional program.
P2860
Q30579456-D8205CB8-6807-4B91-B30E-16088A7B0AB0Q33604876-D700DE1E-CA45-4DCE-87E7-CEE74DE44555Q33636578-9AE759EE-328F-44AB-AD69-B6F512989BC3Q34314867-3DD89581-5A66-4308-9A12-01CB1C9800EBQ34476296-A9E23434-48BB-4B23-AB5B-E6F10609859FQ34574216-36B05963-068D-47E2-A7E6-93EB90F15B06Q34618554-97ACC328-B011-4233-982A-235656F4007EQ34640578-827B7812-7347-46A6-8D06-4A3030656D9CQ34894204-AB3235FD-D0F9-436D-B0FA-5BC7AB060FC0Q34975681-71E6E2CA-900B-4F27-A3DB-5BC588C08B44Q35154736-1ECF3105-A3D2-4D55-B4EF-B6C7F0DBC2D4Q35923083-3AF435F9-DC9F-42AF-B72A-D630FB2A62FCQ35976818-15C2CF37-22E6-4DE6-8EBD-D0EC8B926476Q36371252-B5DCB02E-0044-40DC-88FE-A04A6C475116Q36568603-9C55E473-CF75-4761-AD92-9578069E583CQ36617233-4436899D-B51D-4B35-A0BB-0783CC4B7E6AQ37091512-18A8A903-1ED7-4D32-A748-816644A67F43Q37161099-3BCE3F3C-B05B-4E2C-87DF-1E1D7AC58EF6Q37339070-BFA9A07B-980D-4315-8EBA-2F5CB3E8D934Q37846221-38E330ED-F0C7-4B01-B703-BAB9219424E1Q37973800-C4F4891D-2F6E-42B1-AEA8-4A5F4D845FFCQ37976488-10591526-1403-4A6B-B010-707402302DDFQ38163617-F02AEBFD-323A-403C-9E7C-3C70C7365B92Q38568310-09047F45-C9DA-49DD-B68D-33E9553CEE68Q38781038-49B6264F-32EF-4846-B9C6-3E8F8C3BB49EQ38799405-A592C67A-3AED-49A5-A905-9122AABA6931Q38904970-2A9E68C3-D64E-4D71-9B32-83CDA53B0C62Q38905329-4AF8C0E8-7EFB-44FA-9360-83168D300FB3Q38966487-FF3E18D9-3187-4012-8B6B-2DC984F072C4Q39034757-F1BBC6EB-2EDD-43D6-8DDB-A269C814D5A4Q39165737-BE775B78-CB8E-42C3-9A15-B16CF9F5D590Q39454163-C83499E8-DA2C-44BD-A698-49C722D94E41Q39482983-9F08A5CC-6731-47E6-A0F7-6308A712D93DQ39629897-8337228C-44CC-4349-A586-676F4CD65FF9Q39665171-9FFA1C75-616F-46D0-9F4C-F5CCE42D2D3EQ39710701-8E0B51E5-4D81-4059-9B95-9CCDF4DDD76DQ39718819-76531804-0B19-43EC-9CFB-26C933B1D959Q39754815-AAEFC82F-81AA-4625-A392-40C9B3D2EA37Q40567322-3F73399B-F9B6-4B76-AE48-18B0CB1991DBQ41141915-6B6F62AA-ECDF-4365-AAC3-766FBF6967DC
P2860
Reliability and validity of admissions tools used to select students for the health professions.
description
2001 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2001 թուականի Յունուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2001 թվականի հունվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2001年の論文
@ja
2001年論文
@yue
2001年論文
@zh-hant
2001年論文
@zh-hk
2001年論文
@zh-mo
2001年論文
@zh-tw
2001年论文
@wuu
name
Reliability and validity of ad ...... ts for the health professions.
@ast
Reliability and validity of ad ...... ts for the health professions.
@en
Reliability and validity of ad ...... ts for the health professions.
@nl
type
label
Reliability and validity of ad ...... ts for the health professions.
@ast
Reliability and validity of ad ...... ts for the health professions.
@en
Reliability and validity of ad ...... ts for the health professions.
@nl
prefLabel
Reliability and validity of ad ...... ts for the health professions.
@ast
Reliability and validity of ad ...... ts for the health professions.
@en
Reliability and validity of ad ...... ts for the health professions.
@nl
P356
P1476
Reliability and validity of ad ...... ts for the health professions.
@en
P2093
Salvatori P
P2888
P304
P356
10.1023/A:1011489618208
P577
2001-01-01T00:00:00Z
P6179
1050212600