Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness.
about
Evaluation of the multiple-stimulus without replacement preference assessment method using activities as stimuli.On the correspondence between preference assessment outcomes and progressive-ratio schedule assessments of stimulus valueEvaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferencesBasic and applied research on choice responding.Effects of reinforcement choice on task responding in individuals with developmental disabilities.On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequencesEvaluation of client preference for function-based treatment packages.Displacement of leisure reinforcers by food during preference assessments.Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment.Evaluation of a brief multiple-stimulus preference assessment in a naturalistic context.Assessing reinforcers under progressive schedule requirements.Evaluating the predictive validity of a single stimulus engagement preference assessmentAn evaluation of two differential reinforcement procedures with escape extinction to treat food refusal.On the relative contributions of positive reinforcement and escape extinction in the treatment of food refusal.On the relative contributions of noncontingent reinforcement and escape extinction in the treatment of food refusal.An analysis of choice making in the assessment of young children with severe behavior problems.Correspondence between single versus daily preference assessment outcomes and reinforcer efficacy under progressive-ratio schedules.Assessing potency of high- and low-preference reinforcers with respect to response rate and response patternsPreference assessment procedures for individuals with developmental disabilities.Assessing Preferences for Animals in Children with Autism: A New Use for Video-Based Preference Assessment.Discrimination Skills Predict Effective Preference Assessment Methods for Adults with Developmental Disabilities.Predicting Optimal Preference Assessment Methods for Individuals with Developmental DisabilitiesA comparison of verbal and tangible stimulus preference assessmentsThe effects of magnitude and quality of reinforcement on choice responding during play activities.The value of choice as a reinforcer for typically developing children.Caregiver- and staff-conducted functional analysis outcomes: a summary of 52 cases.Assessing the efficacy of pictorial preference assessments for children with developmental disabilities.Description of a practitioner model for identifying preferred stimuli with individuals with autism spectrum disorders.Using progressive ratio schedules to evaluate tokens as generalized conditioned reinforcers.Use of a latency-based demand assessment to identify potential demands for functional analyses.Examining the reinforcing value of stimuli within social and non-social contexts in children with and without high-functioning autism.A comparison between traditional economical and demand curve analyses of relative reinforcer efficacy in the validation of preference assessment predictions.Evaluation of assessment methods for identifying social reinforcers.Are video-based preference assessments without access to selected stimuli effective?Providing alternative reinforcers to facilitate tolerance to delayed reinforcement following functional communication training.Effects of increased response effort and reinforcer delay on choice and aberrant behavior.Use of a concurrent operants paradigm to evaluate positive reinforcers during treatment of food refusal.
P2860
Q34101146-96990EAF-26AB-4A90-AAE6-0CA5EC58DAFDQ34101241-626DF4FE-5730-4892-8137-1AD9B769ABFBQ34133827-484BDCBF-80DA-410F-81CD-74A0B463C4BCQ34133995-ED296EB0-19E4-47A1-B853-183F8E622936Q34134002-96D9DEED-109F-4EA0-B44B-BA458D8EC4B2Q34134015-F4DCB0B1-7F0C-4BD9-8495-095FB62DF2DFQ34134027-1EF9738B-58B1-42EE-A47E-FFE1F99A73AAQ34134033-AA280D6A-77EC-414A-8268-B37437DCD3CAQ34134315-2AB9006E-9D77-4B0B-9066-4081DF06EC9CQ34134741-80A002FB-1F98-45EF-AD87-FAB39B09E1FEQ34134931-04A4906C-7EE6-4660-928E-94BD18E33F61Q34135054-9ACBC723-9123-4F9C-B556-1F4B86E4D046Q34135310-47D7752B-8FB9-4B7C-8872-CB96224FFF6BQ34135485-A69EF4FA-E986-4370-BAF2-1926D1BC408EQ34135635-BCEF0159-72A3-40D1-B539-46E5956A9349Q34135923-A351EBCE-90A1-4DA4-B5A8-F79CACB7A58AQ34322823-66A76B02-2565-4330-9F70-ECB57A8746DBQ34791253-F79B7E7A-A8BC-4450-A6CD-F7DF512B47ABQ35856791-4AEB3A38-E2D7-414B-BF81-0025248413A1Q38739437-13A33828-D225-4C5D-BF92-0F0D73D1B901Q39276612-F95D1ADD-FD14-497F-9055-387170243E2CQ39314104-0A436F15-6F36-487F-9425-CAA030A8FC12Q39712352-3CBEF091-15BD-4259-B3C5-7D8D6E320647Q39715202-E757C2AF-7F05-4820-8C35-1955F391F1E7Q42695411-CEFB087C-6D16-44CE-A086-8F7E8A2FEF88Q45910843-DB5B3EFF-AB4F-4D60-ACA0-313AAF31FC35Q46367488-D01863D7-CF81-4DC7-803C-BB71CBCFCEC9Q46664283-4C27D3FD-D24E-40FB-A8EE-AB9857CE93A2Q47304120-31C9425D-766C-41CB-BEB3-AB49B6F0A12DQ47971506-AC159587-38A6-48DD-9ADD-E5B123EC22F8Q50200093-D1412FBC-87D5-4B2E-AEE7-549FE2DACAB0Q50307828-3C4D7435-5FFE-4FD7-8B06-F19BCFB8373BQ50341254-F4049E58-FEBE-4CB6-AB57-115EDA3CB7EBQ50345729-3DC4647D-28C0-49C0-9465-BE1A44B236AEQ50587685-3FB8EEC5-717F-4918-8BF1-E65B0193EB2DQ52049073-EB509B09-291A-4279-802A-C01F8BF45948Q52180050-A1AF5051-2E4E-464C-92FF-76711D5B21B5
P2860
Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness.
description
1996 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1996年の論文
@ja
1996年論文
@yue
1996年論文
@zh-hant
1996年論文
@zh-hk
1996年論文
@zh-mo
1996年論文
@zh-tw
1996年论文
@wuu
1996年论文
@zh
1996年论文
@zh-cn
name
Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness.
@en
Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness.
@nl
type
label
Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness.
@en
Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness.
@nl
prefLabel
Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness.
@en
Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness.
@en
P2093
P2860
P356
10.1901/JABA.1996.29-1
P577
1996-01-01T00:00:00Z