Factors that might undermine the validity of patient and multi-source feedback. - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

Factors that might undermine the validity of patient and multi-source feedback.

Factors that might undermine the validity of patient and multi-source feedback.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q37919132

about

Psychometric analysis of the Swedish version of the General Medical Council's multi source feedback questionnaires.Assessing doctors' competencies using multisource feedback: validating a Japanese version of the Sheffield Peer Review Assessment Tool (SPRAT).ARCADO - Adding random case analysis to direct observation in workplace-based formative assessment of general practice registrars Workplace-based Assessment; Applications and Educational Impact.The construct and criterion validity of the multi-source feedback process to assess physician performance: a meta-analysis.A BEME (Best Evidence in Medical Education) review of the use of workplace-based assessment in identifying and remediating underperformance among postgraduate medical trainees: BEME Guide No. 43.Workplace-based assessments in Foundation Programme training: do trainees in difficulty use them differently?Just One Thing: a novel patient feedback model.Difficulty giving feedback on underperformance undermines the educational value of multi-source feedback.Feedback: much more than a tool.

P2860

Q33906866-969F33A9-087E-4BB3-82B4-99834668AB9F Q35778836-2CAEDE33-0C24-4D69-BA67-80AE8F3EF224 Q35865838-ADBA4501-F10E-41E7-A5D6-6ACCB78A5584 Q36287085-7BB10F85-378A-4E39-B970-F176CD85BA0A Q37616655-C286577E-2D8F-4084-9538-BCC3BCF39B14 Q38954122-DF7DE9D1-9BC8-48D7-84A5-DB7D082BBD8F Q39469491-8708E3F7-C29F-4FDE-8BB8-4CB6DCBE0383 Q47363838-06920ED9-F14B-47A5-9791-DE5E30128B7F Q50736612-27EDC404-E1E2-47FF-A1D3-B627BC5CE1BD Q51857391-3D94EC17-0FA0-49B8-BCD7-B6A3815D61E3

P2860

Factors that might undermine the validity of patient and multi-source feedback.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q37919132

description

article científic

@ca

article scientifique

@fr

articol științific

@ro

articolo scientifico

@it

artigo científico

@gl

artigo científico

@pt

artigo científico

@pt-br

artikel ilmiah

@id

artikull shkencor

@sq

artículo científico

@es

name

Factors that might undermine the validity of patient and multi-source feedback.

@en

Factors that might undermine the validity of patient and multi-source feedback.

@nl

type

label

Factors that might undermine the validity of patient and multi-source feedback.

@en

Factors that might undermine the validity of patient and multi-source feedback.

@nl

prefLabel

Factors that might undermine the validity of patient and multi-source feedback.

@en

Factors that might undermine the validity of patient and multi-source feedback.

@nl

P1433

Q37919132-AB93C16C-B9BE-4CEB-9B56-5BFA43586D93

P1476

Q37919132-DD750C2B-99C6-4868-B52B-B13F35255BAE

P2093

Q37919132-2D7E2FE1-AC31-4CC6-AF76-0C63886695D1

P2860

Q37919132-142964D9-EB7F-46B3-8212-11AD3B8D218D

Q37919132-23C7AA1D-86D2-4FD4-A7E4-D6B593FD0210

Q37919132-4FE16396-41A1-4DA4-8E72-044F96298AF6

Q37919132-793DF2D1-B635-4332-8751-269E468398BE

Q37919132-80DEAEB2-AAE0-4F53-ABC0-025C5C38C796

Q37919132-8400A619-911A-4345-91C4-63796222DE86

Q37919132-AB1CEC0C-822E-4BE6-8CBF-65133C28A037

Q37919132-B0479336-2D71-40AA-BC12-430B0DBACB19

Q37919132-D9DFD157-FC0B-4C41-9DE6-F3E14A05E48A

Q37919132-DB594FFF-2706-40C6-AAFC-98C2BCA6DF15

P304

Q37919132-A863BC6D-22F8-48F7-9494-5911DB3DBA1F

P31

Q37919132-A6C7FB8A-4D07-4DD9-9775-0ABB7EF89E83

P356

Q37919132-6D7549EF-A2EB-443C-A89C-732D0F91B859

P433

Q37919132-87C32EFD-866C-45EB-9B76-48677E61D176

P478

Q37919132-3C9ABE39-130E-418F-8482-31D9E42E563A

P50

Q37919132-1EF0680A-3AC5-4460-B7FD-4D76DDC0EA3B

P577

Q37919132-6828DF20-DD67-4E6D-B865-EEE0E450F60E

P5875

Q37919132-6B77FF59-0E05-4294-96C8-CFF857A293B1

P698

Q37919132-281FB0C8-CF83-4CFC-A37D-FE8BB9DAB8E1

P921

Q37919132-2B8863CB-7420-46F3-9E77-5362D56CF473

P356

J.1365-2923.2011.04023.X

P1433

Medical Education

P1476

Factors that might undermine the validity of patient and multi-source feedback

@en

P2093

Pauline McAvoy

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Peer assessment of professional competence.

Use of SPRAT for peer review of paediatricians in training.

An examination of the appropriateness of using a common peer assessment instrument to assess physician skills across specialties.

Doctors' consultations with children and their parents: a model of competencies, outcomes and confounding influences.

mini-PAT (Peer Assessment Tool): a valid component of a national assessment programme in the UK?

Assessing the practising physician using patient surveys: a systematic review of instruments and feedback methods.

Specialty-specific multi-source feedback: assuring validity, informing training.

Assuring validity of multisource feedback in a national programme.

Feasibility of hospital-based use of peer ratings to evaluate the performances of practicing physicians.

Assessing the professional performance of UK doctors: an evaluation of the utility of the General Medical Council patient and colleague questionnaires.

P304

886-893

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1111/J.1365-2923.2011.04023.X

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

9

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

45

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

P577

2011-09-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

51578024

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

21848716

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921