Do images influence assessment in anatomy? Exploring the effect of images on item difficulty and item discrimination.
about
Is a picture worth a thousand words: an analysis of the difficulty and discrimination parameters of illustrated vs. text-alone vignettes in histology multiple choice questions.Remote histology learning from static versus dynamic microscopic images.Effects of image-based and text-based active learning exercises on student examination performance in a musculoskeletal anatomy course.Assessment of anatomical knowledge: Approaches taken by higher education institutions.Modified team-based learning strategy to improve human anatomy learning: A pilot study at the Universidad del Norte in Barranquilla, Colombia.The effect of images on item statistics in multiple choice anatomy examinations.Evaluation of the effectiveness of 3D vascular stereoscopic models in anatomy instruction for first year medical students.Mobile technology: Creation and use of an iBook to teach the anatomy of the brachial plexus.The eye of the beholder: Can patterns in eye movement reveal aptitudes for spatial reasoning?Actual drawing of histological images improves knowledge retention.Student performance on practical gross anatomy examinations is not affected by assessment modality.Medical student perceptions of radiology use in anatomy teaching.Stereopsis, Visuospatial Ability, and Virtual Reality in Anatomy Learning.Learning anatomy enhances spatial ability.Longitudinal retention of anatomical knowledge in second-year medical students.Anatomical knowledge gain through a clay-modeling exercise compared to live and video observations.Exploring the validity of assessment in anatomy: do images influence cognitive processes used in answering extended matching questions?Illustrated versus non-illustrated anatomical test items in anatomy course tests and German Medical Licensing examinations (M1).
P2860
Q35821673-9EB23260-91DA-420C-8D7B-CC410C436F68Q38956145-2D5DBC62-3126-4D08-8989-0C2DB575ED33Q38974227-2728CDBD-47CB-4304-8239-AA02383E0A59Q39125584-386DC068-1E02-435F-8CBB-E178C6F1977AQ39232589-BFEC5863-BFB4-4A2A-A3A0-6285F8C038B1Q39545230-D1556402-7248-4CA6-ACD5-662DFB71BD93Q39702144-BB1B9936-CBB5-4904-A6CA-4C29B10F4301Q40231450-AAF8D1C4-A726-4A9D-9E63-19C6DF8F86F4Q40283279-C9DDB719-78EC-473F-9427-384329865BDBQ40879559-0C5F9DA9-ACB0-486B-9778-53060B13E05CQ40932573-2D91C3FF-2A96-4C3B-B4FC-3D47B75ACA3BQ41681400-049AFC8C-9BC7-45D6-A804-F3865D205079Q42201826-42BB29D2-8AB4-4C75-BD3B-4546DAB756EAQ44649051-003CE10F-C42A-4F74-8A7A-D312EF3CD46DQ47668804-2EE5C424-C4CA-4F1E-9FD3-9BA038031235Q50679469-F18005AA-1F7C-44B8-88FD-FCF43BD0839CQ50702803-503A9A54-AFD9-4BB5-B93B-FB9866B02B82Q55387982-7A9D38E7-1AAB-4DC1-BCF3-3B2D277E8A40
P2860
Do images influence assessment in anatomy? Exploring the effect of images on item difficulty and item discrimination.
description
2012 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2012年の論文
@ja
2012年学术文章
@wuu
2012年学术文章
@zh
2012年学术文章
@zh-cn
2012年学术文章
@zh-hans
2012年学术文章
@zh-my
2012年学术文章
@zh-sg
2012年學術文章
@yue
2012年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Do images influence assessment ...... culty and item discrimination.
@en
Do images influence assessment ...... culty and item discrimination.
@nl
type
label
Do images influence assessment ...... culty and item discrimination.
@en
Do images influence assessment ...... culty and item discrimination.
@nl
prefLabel
Do images influence assessment ...... culty and item discrimination.
@en
Do images influence assessment ...... culty and item discrimination.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
Do images influence assessment ...... culty and item discrimination.
@en
P2093
Jan G M Kooloos
Marc A T M Vorstenbosch
Roland F J M Laan
Sanneke M Bolhuis
Tim P F M Klaassen
P2860
P356
10.1002/ASE.1290
P577
2012-06-06T00:00:00Z